Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Whole-body CT
Charles Brault c_brault at yahoo.comTue Jan 31 13:22:33 GMT 2012
- Previous message: Whole-body CT
- Next message: Whole-body CT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: "Gross, Ronald" <Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.org> To: 'Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG]' <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 6:49 AM Subject: RE: Whole-body CT Norman, We also ask that the patients be stabilized and sent without imaging. Sadly, however, imaging is a very good way for our referring hospitals to make money on the patients that they send to us so that we can take the morbidity/mortality hit... ****************** N O P E Here in Canuck land Where monetary concerns are definitely not on the radar If only in a negative way (May cost additional OverTime, supply, hassle) The Dx trap still kills many an unsuspecting (mostly trauma) Patients Natasha Richardson spent 2 hours in a small hosp For What ? Charles -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of McSwain, Norman E Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 11:38 PM To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG] Subject: RE: Whole-body CT Currently we do NOT request assessment using CT before transport from an outlying hospital. This just delays the needed transport. If the referring physician believes that the patients meets either anatomic or physiologic triage, we say to send the patient immediately. Since we do not use Mechanism of Iinjury only for destination protocols, this would be a physician to physician discussion. If the patient needs to be in a trauma center we do not request further workup using CT or anything else Norman Norman McSwain MD, FACS Professor of Surgery, Tulane University Trauma director, Spirit of Charity Trauma Center, ILH 504 988 5111 -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Krin135 at aol.com Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:48 PM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Re: Whole-body CT Pret: At least as late as 2005, there was a problem with certain receiving programs where PGIII docs were the initial point of contact, and *EVEN* in the face of quoting Mattox, McSwain, Bromberg et al, and the latest (then the 7th, IIRC) edition of ATLS, the residents were insisting on having full work ups before accepting patients for transfer.....and then proceeded to repeat all the tests when the patient arrived....to the point where I occasionally had to contact the surgical attending....several of whom I had served with during residency...to get the patient on the road in a reasonable amount of time. I understand that Dr. Wigle has solved at least part of the problem.... Oh, and as a FP doc, I qualified as an ATLS instructor along the way, so not all FPs are/were high turnover moving targets. I have maintained for years that it would help if the ACS/COT, the ACEP and the AAFP would co-ordinate things better....The Comprehensive Advanced Life Support Course started by the Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians and the Minn. College of Surgeons back in the 1990s was an attempt to reduce the 'merit badge courses' from four or five (ACLS, ATLS, PALS/APLS and ALSO, along with special packages on burns and chemical injuries) by combining all of the anatomy, physio, pathophysio and pharm sections, and emphasizing the team work (Ideally, rural facilities would send a doc, a couple of nurses and a couple of paramedics as a team to go through the course together) needed in smaller facilities. I don't see where CALS has had much penetration outside of the North Central Tier. ck In a message dated 01/30/12 14:52:59 Central Standard Time, pbjorn at emh.org writes: Honestly, I don't think ATLS deserves much credit OR blame for the over-use of CT's in rural systems. The "Transfer to Definitive Care" lecture is short and soft-edged -- and follows several hours of slideshows and skills stations which feature CT's as a common diagnostic modality. Moreover, the ATLS certification rate in many rural systems is far from ideal: courses are rare and expensive and distant, and providers (often moonlighting family practitioners or mid-levels or locums) are a high-turnover moving target. The College has produced a "Rural Trauma Team Development Course," which does an excellent job of examining various diagnostic yields in the context of inevitable transfer, and wisely brings nurses and medics and other staff into the conversation; but in its most recent iteration it is discouragingly expensive to disseminate. (We're exploring our options; but jeez, they went from FREE to fifty bucks a head, practically overnight.) And so, regular outreach and published guidelines may be our best hope of modifying behaviors. One can hope. Pret -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Doc Holiday Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 5:05 PM To: .Trauma List Subject: RE: Whole-body CT From: pbjorn at emh.org >... EMS Trauma Advisory Committee is preparing this guideline (attached, currently in draft) for addition to our other online advice to trauma system providers. Comments or suggestions welcome. --> Good ol' ATLS. Nice. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------------------------------- This email message, including any associated files, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, or subject to copyright, trade secret or other protection. This message also may contain information protected by state and federal privacy laws that are enforced through serious civil and criminal sanctions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail, and delete the original and all copies of this message from your computer or other device. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please view our annual report at http://baystatehealth.org/annualreport CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at 413-794-0000 and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. For further information regarding Baystate Health's privacy policy, please visit our Internet site at http://baystatehealth.org. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Whole-body CT
- Next message: Whole-body CT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
