Paranoia et al.

• Previous message: Paranoia et al.
• Next message: Paranoia et al.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ken
We all want you to be wrong about the imminent and daily threat 
There are obviously enemies out there it's just hard to think about all the time. Nevertheless as you said we must be prepared for this on every level

A. Candace Marcus RN MSN ARNP HCRM JD ESQ
McIntosh Sawran Peltz & Cartaya
1776 E. Sunrise Blvd
Ft Lauderdale Fl
954-765-1001

Sent from my iPhone to respond expeditiously so forgive errors

On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:19 PM, KMATTOX at aol.com wrote:

> Let me be clear.  My concern note was precipitated by the recent  TV and 
> newspaper reporting,  but my concerns were caused by my own  listening to the 
> signals and reading of the tea leaves, and observing the  obvious increasing 
> in exploratory probing of just what our security responses  might be in one 
> location or another, and in my own surfing the web and reading  
> international newspapers and noting a significant increase in chatter and subtle  
> communications.   
> 
> k 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 9/29/2010 1:51:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> brombwi1 at memorialhealth.com writes:
> 
> So let  me get this straight. There was just a news release that a major 
> terrorist  attack based on the Mumbai model of a small group of armed men 
> making suicide  assaults on European cities was averted by concerted 
> intra-governmental police  and intelligence action and the take home message is that we 
> are paranoid to  be worrying about our medical preparations for mass 
> casualty  events?
> 
> Bill Bromberg
> 
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/

• Previous message: Paranoia et al.
• Next message: Paranoia et al.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]