Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Another Policy Question
KMATTOX at aol.com KMATTOX at aol.comThu Dec 30 00:53:17 GMT 2010
- Previous message: Another Policy Question
- Next message: Another Policy Question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Air is FANTASTIC for off shore, wilderness, or high rise rescue. If one is using the helicopter as an air frame ambulance, the predominance of literature and meta analysis states the following: 1. From first call to arrival at definitive facility, ground is better than air 2. Costs of air is 20-25 times greater than ground 3. Survival is better statistically for ground than air. 4. For organ recovery for transplants in brain dead patients, ground is better than air 5. For crashes, air is more dangerous than ground 6. For advertising for the company that owns the ambulance, air is better than ground. 7. For overall beneficial outcomes ground is better than air, especially for the conditions you made for your case. k In a message dated 12/29/2010 6:48:19 P.M. Central Standard Time, dwseastrom at cmh.edu writes: I know there was a question posted on here earlier about policies. I also have a question as to whether anyone has policies/guidelines/protocols as to the transfers of their patients and how they are getting from Point A - Point B. I guess I'm wondering if anyone has it spelled out that these patients (i.e. aortic tears, etc.) will get air transport preferentially or ground, etc. Does anyone also have a "back-up" plan in writing in case a patient who is very sick has to go by ground EMS for a bit of a distance and maybe 1 Paramedic is insufficient to care for him/her (nurses/residents/attendings to accompany the patient, etc.). I know there has also been some discussion around what's appropriate for air (with the recent crash in Missouri) floating around and was curious if anyone has seen any evidence based info out there on this? I've been digging and ready a lot of the papers and it seems there really isn't too much of a concensus (unless I'm missing something). The only thing I have found some consistency in is that it is only beneficial to the "most critically injured" patients. I've also seen the guideline recommendations from AAMS Any input on either topic would be great and appreciated! Thanks a bunch and stay WARM! :) David Seastrom RN, BSN, EMT-I Trauma Injury Prevention / Outreach Education Coordinator The Children's Mercy Hospitals & Clinics Kansas City, MO. 64108 Office: 816-983-6917 Fax: 816-234-3821 Pager: 816-458-4995 E-mail: dwseastrom at cmh.edu<mailto:dwseastrom at cmh.edu> -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Another Policy Question
- Next message: Another Policy Question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
