Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Flail chests
Stephen Richey stephen.richey at gmail.comThu Aug 19 00:38:59 BST 2010
- Previous message: Flail chests
- Next message: Flail chests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ah...I see what you are getting at now Dr. Mattox. It is simply a matter of how I was taught: that flail chest was the chest wall injury and not the underlying pulmonary injury and resultant complications. . My only concern with the use of "flail chest" in this situation (to describe the entire clinical syndrome you are talking about) is that it describes a scenario that is more or less two separate (although intertwined) problems: namely a flail segment with contused lung that leads to respiratory failure. Practically you could have the latter without the former (and need the same treatment to avoid worsening the condition) and theoretically could have (at least in the patient with brittle ribs, etc) have the former without the latter. Forgive me if that is a little rambling... On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:26 PM, <KMATTOX at aol.com> wrote: > It is obvious to me that the works of the late Kent Trinkle, first of > Louisville, Ky, and later of San Antonio, Texas are beginning to be forgotten; > > It is also apparent that we each perceive a different visual image of just > what is meant by the words, "Flail Chest." For decades flail chest > referred to a syndrome of pulmonary insufficiency asssociated with a contused > lung from blunt chest wall trauma, with multiple rib fractures seen in > different locations anterior and posterior or parasternally, and manifest by > an external paradoxical movement of the flail segment, resulting in a > rocking motion of the chest wall with inspiration and expiration. > > Most often no abnormality was seen when the patient first came into the > emergency room, and would have a relatively normal blood gas, but would have > hypoxemia later often requiring intubation. > > Patients who had rib fractures in multiple locations and were not hypoxemic > were not said to have a "flail chest". In those days , flail chest > was treated by fixation of the chest wall, often by traction applied to a set > of pins placed beneath the pectoral muscles or the sternum, in order to > stop the paradoxical movement, with no attention to the progressively water > filled lung underneath. > > With Kent Trinkles work, we all learned and stopped over hydrating the > patients. He should be credited with the whole movement of fluid restriction > in trauma patients. Then 18 years later came along the sporatic and > regionally popular operative fixation of multiple rib fracture segments and > there was a whole new interest in flail chest. That technique is > still being questioned as to its indications and contraindications. AND it > has resulted in a whole generation of people creating a new meaning for the > terms flail chest. > > Just as there is a whole generation of radiologist and vascular surgeons > that are creating a whole new definition of the word "dissection." > > We need a new lexicon . > > k > a > > In a message dated 8/18/2010 8:28:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > stephen.richey at gmail.com writes: > > Pret, > Then I would think it would have made more sense for him to make the > statement that there is a correlation between lung injury and > excessively aggressive fluid resuscitation and not specifically flail > chest. Maybe once he gets back with us, he will be able to clarify > just what he was speaking towards. Like I said, I was probably > missing something especially since my reply was made on little sleep > and a lot of caffeine. > > Of course, nothing is "intuitive" (although I do see what you are > driving at and tend to agree with you based on what data I have seen) > since it seemed intuitive at one time to restore patients who were > hypotensive due to trauma to normal blood pressures. That is the risk > inherent in relying upon intuition in trauma. Personally, I too would > love to see it quantified. > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Bjorn, Pret <pbjorn at emh.org> wrote: >> I think it's clear that Dr. Mattox is referring to the morbid > consequences of flail chest, and not the primary injury. It makes intuitive sense > that hyper-resuscitation is hard on contused lungs, and we've certainly seen > as much in our patients. >> >> It'd be interesting to quantify, though. Are there any studies to > support the assertion? >> >> Pret Bjorn, RN >> Bangor, ME USA >> >> PS: The assertion that " aggressive field resuscitation allows more of > these patients to survive to admission" is not only unsubstantiated; it runs > contrary to a growing heap of published data. It's a dated and dangerous > notion. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Richey >> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 2:49 AM >> To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG] >> Subject: Re: Flail chests >> >> Dr. Mattox, >> Can I ask you to elaborate how excessive fluid resuscitation and a >> flail chest are tied to together? I know my mechanisms of injury >> pretty well since I do injury prevention research but either you are >> picking up on something I am missing or you are seeing a false >> correlation. >> >> Could it be that patients with flail chest, which in most trauma >> patients indicates a severe blow to the chest and/or a very >> non-compliant chest wall (and the resultant increase in severity of >> the trauma to internal organs and vascular structures associated with >> either of those) that the aggressive field resuscitation allows more >> of these patients to survive to admission where many of them suffer >> the complications and negative implications of that resuscitation well >> documented by yourself and your colleagues? In other words, the fluid >> resuscitation simply shifts the mortality from the prehospital to the >> in-hospital phase (immediate versus delayed in the classic tri-modal >> distribution). Like I said, maybe I am missing something or >> misunderstanding what you are trying to get at. That said, I do agree >> that the section needs to be revised. >> >> Dr. Gross, if you don't mind, I would like to hear more about your >> proposed study off-list. >> >> Steve >> >>>> In the absence of fluid overload in the ambulance or the EC, "flail" >>>> segments of multiple rib fractures are almost NEVER seen. Flail > Chest should be considered to be an iatrogenic complication of the protocols > which start 2 large bore IVs and flood the patient with fluid. Yes, > I do believe that ATLS needs its fluid resuscitation section revised. >>>> >>>> k >>>> >>>> >>>> In a message dated 8/17/2010 11:08:37 A.M. Central Daylight Time, >>>> Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.org writes: >>>> >>>> Funny timing here, Mark! I have been struggling to pull a study >>>> together, >>>> and was hoping to work with the guys on the west coast to get it going >>>> since they apparently already have a protocol in search of a funding >>>> source. >>>> Unfortunately, it looks like they want to make a go of it on their own. >>>> Coincidentally, the Boston group and I talked about this in the recent >>>> past, >>>> and at the same time we just hired a new partner who just happens to > have >>>> really good results that they have gathered at his previous shop. >>>> >>>> Bottom line - stay tuned, 'cause I am going to reach out to y'all very >>>> shortly to hopefully move this almost dead study forward into the light >>>> again! >>>> >>>> While I have your attention - has anything ever come of that other > issue >>>> you and I had discussed several months ago? I hadn't heard any news, > and >>>> so >>>> I assumed that it was just a lot of nothing......at least I hope so! > Let >>>> me know, if you have the time. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> Ron >>>> >> >> -- >> Stephen Richey, CRT >> >> "A man's moral worth is established only at the point where he is >> ready to give up his life in defense of his convictions."- Henning von >> Tresckow >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> >> >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> > > > > -- > Stephen Richey, CRT > > "A man's moral worth is established only at the point where he is > ready to give up his life in defense of his convictions."- Henning von > Tresckow > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- Stephen Richey, CRT "A man's moral worth is established only at the point where he is ready to give up his life in defense of his convictions."- Henning von Tresckow
- Previous message: Flail chests
- Next message: Flail chests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
