Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Question
Garth Melnick gmelnick at efn.orgTue Sep 29 03:51:47 BST 2009
- Previous message: Question for the panel.......
- Next message: Medical Helicopter Crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Some large EMS/ambulance agencies hold the official policy -- developed solely, as near as I can tell, by the lawyers in Risk Management -- that any patient who is transported emergently (lights/ sirens) to a hospital MUST go to the closest. Only exceptions are for STEMI to cath lab, trauma pts going to a trauma center, and peds. The theory appears to be that any hospital provides a "higher level of care" then EMS, and the only "responsible" thing to do is get the pt in front of an MD -- any MD -- as soon as possible. Obviously this is just one experience, but as with so many things in modern medicine, this transport decision may be based on policy informed by legal rather than clinical considerations. Garth NREMTP On Sep 28, 2009, at 08:33 , kmattox at aol.com wrote: >> From what I have read and experienced, this policy to stop at the >> nearest > facility should be changed. It is based on some old desires to not > loose > business, even though the closest facility often does not have the > appropriate expertese. > > k > > > > > > In a message dated 9/28/2009 10:14:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > Krin135 at aol.com writes: > > Virtually all of the Basic only > squads I've worked with in the past 20 years are required by their > protocols to > transport to the nearest facility. > > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Question for the panel.......
- Next message: Medical Helicopter Crash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
