Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify Your Subscription

Modify

Home > List Archives

TRANSMEDIASTINAL GSW

Gross, Ronald Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.org
Mon Sep 14 19:25:22 BST 2009


Brother, you ain't too stupid to live....you're just like the rest of us - you're too stupid to die!!!!!   :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Robert Smith
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 2:05 PM
To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG]
Subject: Re: TRANSMEDIASTINAL GSW

Well. I apologize for being too stupid to live and sending what was  
supposed to be a private post to the whole list. I would never be so  
disrespectful.

Thank you for addressing my question. The original post stated that  
the GSW was transmediastinal, presumably, as you say from info from  
the CXR. Given your feeling re: the utility of CT for vascular injury,  
I didn't see where a stop in CT would help the pt or you. Certainly  
not with our scanner in it's location. I understand that you can't fix  
bleeding in the resus area and I'm mindful of the utility of  
"hypotensive resuscitation". In RL sometimes it seems pts with really  
low bp will continue to trend down. It takes a few minutes to actually  
get to the OR even in the most extreme cases; call OR, blood bank,  
assemble operative and transport personnel, get to elevator and ride  
it up, etc. My surgical pack mates (not to mention anesthesia) feel  
strongly that operating on a pt with some bp is much more fun than one  
without any. So probably some type of fluids would be given to the pt  
as he is being processed to the OR, staying focussed on the fact that  
timely arrival in the OR is the point of the process.

What was the cause of your pt's intestinal ischemia? What was done  
about it and what do you think the course of her disease will be?  
Might I ask where pts like this that emergency/trauma surgery  
intervenes on go to the next day?

Rob Smith


On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:19 PM, KMATTOX at aol.com wrote:

>
>
> In a message dated 9/14/2009 12:08:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> rfsmithmd at comcast.net writes:
>
> I  understand what you were saying. My question was really directed
> toward Dr. Mattox. If he thought CT scan had no value AND the pt  
> had  a
> bp of 40 because he also didn't want to do anything to improve his  bp
> (yeah I'm sure he would do nothing for someone who's bp is 40!!),  the
> why did he say he personally would have gotten a CT??? Of course  he
> didn't answer the question.
>
> What I would have done for the low BP is to go to the OR and control  
> the
> bleeding, not given "stuff" in the ambulance or ER.   My CT is  next  
> to the
> shock room and I would have looked for trajectory of the missile in  a
> mediastinal traverse.   However a close look at the chest X-ray   
> often tells you
> just what you need to do, as it was in this  case.    In this case the
> patient was hypotensive solely for what  was known to have been  
> happening in the
> Left chest, so make a left chest  incision.    BP is a very very poor
> indicator of status of  resuscitation.
>
> CT and CTA do have "some" (not no) value.   We really must  put into
> perspective, and in light of other findings, just why we are  
> getting  CTs at all.
> I had emergency surgery (and trauma) call yesterday, and  again was
> mislead.   A patient had been triaged to Medicine, because  of belly  
> pain, and the
> CT showed what the Radiology faculty stated was  air.  She had  
> abdominal
> pain from intestinal ischemia from low flow and at  laparotomy had  
> no air, and
> not really any  pathology.
>
> k
>
>
>
>
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/

--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at (413) 794-0000 and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. For further information regarding Baystate Health's privacy policy, please visit our Internet web site at http://www.baystatehealth.com.


More information about the trauma-list mailing list