Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
"Handovers are dangerous" so I never go home or go on leave...
William Bromberg brombwi1 at memorialhealth.comMon May 11 19:57:32 BST 2009
- Previous message: "Handovers are dangerous" so I never go home or go on leave...
- Next message: "Handovers are dangerous" so I never go home or go on leave...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Can I politely ask therefore that we please stop using the "handover is dangerous" argument to justify/rationalise another dangerous practice? Maybe the "long hours people" (including me, although I working on a cure or at least palliation ;-) ) need to admit we do it because we want to do it, or at least we want to do it too much to be able to achieve the alternatives. Regards Bill A/Prof William Griggs AM Director Trauma Services Royal Adelaide Hospital william.griggs at health.sa.gov.au Bill, Handoffs ARE dangerous and they do go up under a policy of more doctors working more frequent shifts. This is not an opinion, it's math and data. That being said, my argument is that they are instituting changes in systems that they don't understand, with no attempt to study the effects thereof and no recognition that with either potential or real benefits that there are potential and real downsides. Because no one in "power" will admit that there are any down sides to limiting work hours, there is no RRC committee level recommendations on how to mitigate this; there is no recognition that more manpower is necessary, and there is a willful blindness to problems that occur due to this poorly instituted change in practice. IMO these problems include: 1. More handoffs, poorly handled 2. Less resident education — no, they're not reading more, not doing more research, not performing community service. While they are indeed enjoying life and family more (here in Savannah — beach, drinking, and really good food), their ABSITE scores are not improving, nor is their understanding of basic science. This is seen across the board and at many institutions as far as I can tell. While their caseloads remain nearly unchanged, this means that all the other stuff that makes up a surgical education has gone somewhere. 3. Piss poor professionalism. When you're able to walk out of the hospital at a specific time and have no further responsibility until you walk in the next day it breeds a "not my problem" mentality that clearly has infested a good proportion of the residents with which I interact. 4. Rampant inefficiency — when you stay until the work gets done, the work gets done ASAP. When you can hand the work over to the next guy it's amazing how long it takes (see also OR turnover times). All of these things MAY have a solution, but cramming new work rules into place and telling each residency program to figure it out for themselves is not working as far as I can see. Unless there is some new method of education, I for one will not sign off on a resident's qualification to be an attending surgeon in unsupervised practice after if the hour limits go down to 60 hours and the length of residency training does not go up. Bill Bromberg William J. Bromberg, MD, FACS Savannah Surgical Group 912 350-7412
- Previous message: "Handovers are dangerous" so I never go home or go on leave...
- Next message: "Handovers are dangerous" so I never go home or go on leave...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
