List Archives

Mon Jun 15 18:40:36 BST 2009

Since I work outside of hospitals and generally only comment on the
truly egregious in-hospital practices, such as Reiki, I do not pay
attention to the different severity scores among the different non-ACS
trauma centers in Maryland. Either way, it is not relevant to the topic.
What is relevant is the difference in outcomes of the patients flown vs.
not flown. 

Does delaying the arrival at the trauma center in order to fly the
patient to that same trauma center make any sense? This is one of the
practices that has only been stopped over the objections of Dr. Bass and
Dr. Scalea. 

I do pay attention to the fiasco that is MIEMSS. Until the recent crash,
Dr. Scalea and Dr. Bass were both supporting an EMS flight policy that
makes Reiki look scientific. They could not provide any evidence to
support their position, since there is none. Apparently their energies
were not strong enough to generate research on this topic.

Since they have cut flights by almost 70%, there is no sign that
patients are worse off. When it comes to criticizing EMS charlatanism, I
refuse to remain silent.  

Perhaps you should leave discussion of this topic to those familiar with
the research.

Tim Noonan.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:59 -0400, "Gross, Ronald"
<Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.org> wrote:
> I truly do lament the loss of ANY patient and/or medical crew member in
> the crash of an aircraft.  Whether or not the use of that aircraft is
> justified will be settled right around the same time we see agreement
> between the NRA and the anti-gun lobbies, or peace in the Middle East. 
> So I would ask you to ask one simple question - if we forgot the fact
> that patients arrive to Shock Trauma in an aircraft, and just for laughs
> and giggles assume that they were to arrive by ground, how would outcomes
> compare to other institutions that weren't "guided" by some sort of ACS
> COT/governmental/system arrangement that specified standards and
> scrutinized outcomes, ISS for ISS, TRISS for TRISS.
> 
> OK, gotta go now - need to light my incense and open the door for my
> masseuse!
> 
> Ron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
> [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of htaed_rd at 123mail.org
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 5:11 PM
> To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG]
> Subject: RE: Alternative therapies (OT)
> 
> How does good treatment inside the hospital justify flying patients with
> minor injuries, or without any injuries?
> 
> The comparison of outcomes between, before the HEMS crash and after the
> crash, have not been published yet. However, nobody seems to be noticing
> any difference after cutting flights by almost 70%. It will be
> interesting to see how they deal with the results of an actual study of
> EMS.
> 
> Am I supposed to encourage the use of helicopters to fly patients with
> body damage to their vehicles, because they usually limit themselves to
> evidence based medicine inside the hospital? Maybe just a bit of Reiki
> because somebody forgot their risperdal the week they set the Reiki
> program up?
> 
> Flying everyone is not evidence based, regardless of their record with
> patients with serious injuries. This is also a way of preventing the
> prehospital providers from developing an ability to assess and treat
> trauma patients. MIEMSS acts as if the medic's only job is to prepare
> the patient for transfer to the helicopter crew. Start an IV, run it
> wide open, give high flow oxygen, hook up the monitor, and fully
> imobilze the patient. The helicopter program, with just one
> cross-trained provider in the back, is seen as a substitute for
> insisting on good paramedics. That isn't my description. Dr. Bass (CEO
> of MIEMSS) has repeatedly stated that having helicopters is the state
> plan for rural EMS. that does not mean that their medics are not good,
> but that they accomplish this in spite of MIEMSS.
> 
> The quality of the hospital does not justify endangering HEMS crews and
> patients on whimsical flights. 
> 
> Delaying arrival at the trauma center, just to put the patient in a
> helicopter is one of the practices that Dr. Bass and Dr. Scalea have
> tried to defend. It certainly isn't based on science. Maybe it is
> something one of their Reiki Masters came up with.
> 
> I do not know how good they are at trauma, but they have an approach to
> EMS that is even less scientific than Reiki.
> 
> Their treatment inside the hospital has nothing to do with their magical
> helicopter rides.
> 
> Tim Noonan.
> 
> 
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:30 -0400, "Gross, Ronald"
> <Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.org> wrote:
> > Tim,
> > Have you taken any time to compare Shock Trauma's outcomes, ISS for ISS,
> > TRISS for TRISS?  I suggest you do before making allegations about magic
> > helicopters and the like.
> > Ron
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: htaed_rd at 123mail.org <htaed_rd at 123mail.org>
> > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:42 PM
> > To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG] <trauma-list at trauma.org>
> > Subject: RE: Alternative therapies (OT)
> > 
> > 
> > Shock Trauma continues to encourage the belief that putting a patient in
> > a helicopter creates a magical healing aura around the patient. If
> > pressure were not put on them after the recent fatal crash, they would
> > still be singing the praises of delaying transport, just to put the
> > patient in the magic helicopter.
> > 
> > They get away with it because they tell the voters that it is Free. As
> > if there is any such thing. Now they are promoting Reiki as Free. The
> > question is, are they as good at medicine as they are at selling snake
> > oil? Do you trust real medicine from a snake oil salesman?
> > 
> > Acupuncture has been repeatedly studied. Acupuncture does not do any
> > better than placebo. Even fake acupuncture has done better than "real
> > acupuncture" in studies. This is not medicine. This is snake oil.
> > 
> > In discussing medicine that is evidence based vs everything not evidence
> > based that is presented as medicine, why do you bring religion into the
> > conversation?
> > 
> > This has nothing to do with religion, unless you worship at the altar of
> > R Adams Cowley's "Golden Hour."
> > 
> > Maybe you believe that Dr. Scalea is divinely inspired in his direction
> > of Shock Trauma.
> > 
> > Bringing religion into this is nothing but misdirection. This has
> > nothing to do with religion, although in Maryland things do take on more
> > than a religious tone, when you suggest that an ambulance could actually
> > drive to a trauma center. Oh, the horror!
> > 
> > Research seems to be the one thing absent from EMS in Maryland.
> > 
> > Not that I have an opinion on the matter.
> > 
> > Tim Noonan.
> > 

List Archives

For your convenience, find the Trauma List Archive Below

Alternative therapies (OT)