Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Alternative therapies (OT)
Charlene M Morris cvmmorris at gmail.comSat Jun 13 12:26:24 BST 2009
- Previous message: Alternative therapies (OT)
- Next message: Alternative therapies (OT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
yah-- I have an MS pt who begged me to find someone to *read her magnets*, assured she could be helped if that occurred.. still, I located a massage therapist who has helped her tremendously. Laying of hands? Placebo effect? Dunno.. It just is-- and none of us get out of here alive. Charlene On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Lorick Fox, MPAS, PA-C <lorick at lorick.org>wrote: > Tim, > > You are exactly correct. > The question (not statement) that I raised based on what was clearly > labeled > anecdote was if the individual practitioner might actually make difference > in acupuncture (and not only has that not been studied, but I have zero > clue > how it could be done). > > The infamous "acupuncture anesthesia of appendectomy" didn't happen. They > used what clearly sounds like an epidural in the original article. > > Moreover, even with the pressure of our old friend Chairman Mao to > "incorporate traditional Chinese care" with science based care, the medical > people in China couldn't do it. If they couldn't, in fear for their life, > it does seem unlikely there was much evidence of benefit even to them. > > That said, and totally based on anecdotal experiences, I am unwilling to > rule out energy fields related to the body - as it would clearly upset > Master Yoda. Use the Force Fiona! > > On the other hand it is arguably better to dismiss such categorically. > The next thing that might happen is that someone adopt the ludicrous > concept > that electrical activity in the body could be detected (are you ready for > this?) by attaching metal leads to the skin, or even claim to see inside > the > body using magnets. Ever heard anything more ridiculous?? > > Lorick > > > Lorick Fox, MPAS, PA-C > Gianaclis Support Complex > +20-3-448-2335 or +20-45-240-9450 > Fax +20-45-243-1191 > Mobile +20-18-230-4448 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list- > > bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of htaed_rd at 123mail.org > > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 10:43 AM > > To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/>] > > Subject: Re: Alternative therapies (OT) > > > > Many people have misrepresented this study. > > > > Here is the way they present it: > > > > Acupuncture is better than standard therapy. > > > > Here is the way that they should present it: > > > > Acupuncture is the same as placebo, when given in addition to standard > > medical treatment. > > > > All of the patients were receiving the standard medical treatment. > > > > Some patients received individualized acupuncture in addition to > > standard medical treatment. > > > > Some patients received standard acupuncture in addition to standard > > medical treatment. > > > > Some patients received fake acupuncture in addition to standard medical > > treatment. > > > > If the criterion for not being snake oil is performing better than > > placebo, acupuncture is clearly snake oil. > > > > Of course, this is just one study. It would be a mistake to base such a > > harsh dismissal of acupuncture on just one study. > > > > Acupuncture has been studied before with the same result. > > > > Acupuncture = Placebo = Snake Oil > > > > Tim Noonan. > > > > Medscape needs to consider some continuing education on the scientific > > method before they start hawking this swill. NCCAM proving exactly what > > it is worth. > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:24 -0430, "listasmsd" <listasmsd at gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > >From Medscape Medical News > > > > > > Actual or Simulated Acupuncture Therapy May Be Effective for Chronic > Low > > > Back Pain CME/CE > > > News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD > > > CME Author: Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd > > > > > > > > > CME/CE Released: 05/20/2009; Valid for credit through 05/20/2010 > > > > > > May 20, 2009 - Actual or simulated acupuncture therapy appears to be > > more > > > effective than usual care for chronic low back pain, according to the > > > results of a randomized controlled trial reported in the May 11 issue > of > > > the > > > Archives of Internal Medicine. > > > > > > "Acupuncture is a popular complementary and alternative treatment for > > > chronic back pain," write Daniel C. Cherkin, PhD, from the Center for > > > Health > > > Studies in Seattle, Washington, and colleagues. "Recent European trials > > > suggest similar short-term benefits from real and sham acupuncture > > > needling. > > > This trial addresses the importance of needle placement and skin > > > penetration > > > in eliciting acupuncture effects for patients with chronic low back > > > pain." > > > > > > In this study, 638 adults with chronic mechanical low back pain were > > > assigned to receive individualized acupuncture, standardized > > acupuncture, > > > simulated acupuncture, or usual care. All acupuncture groups received > 10 > > > treatments administered by experienced acupuncturists during a 7-week > > > period. The main endpoints of the study were back-related dysfunction > > > measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (scored 0 - > 23) > > > and > > > symptom bothersomeness (scored 0 - 10), evaluated at baseline and after > > > 8, > > > 26, and 52 weeks. > > > > > > At 8 weeks, improvements in mean dysfunction scores were 2.1 points for > > > those receiving usual care, 4.4 points for individualized acupuncture, > > > 4.5 > > > points for standardized acupuncture, and 4.4 points for simulated > > > acupuncture (P < .001). Compared with participants receiving usual > care, > > > those receiving real or simulated acupuncture were more likely to > > achieve > > > clinically meaningful improvements on the dysfunction scale (60% vs > 39%; > > > P < > > > .001). > > > > > > In the usual-care group, symptoms improved by 0.7 points vs 1.6 to 1.9 > > > points in the treatment groups (P < .001). Clinically meaningful > > > improvements in dysfunction persisted in the treatment groups vs the > > > usual-care group after 1 year (59% - 65% vs 50%, respectively; P = > .02), > > > but > > > symptom improvements were not significantly different among groups (P > > > > .05). > > > > > > "Although acupuncture was found effective for chronic low back pain, > > > tailoring needling sites to each patient and penetration of the skin > > > appear > > > to be unimportant in eliciting therapeutic benefits," the study authors > > > write. "These findings raise questions about acupuncture's purported > > > mechanisms of action. It remains unclear whether acupuncture or our > > > simulated method of acupuncture provide[s] physiologically important > > > stimulation or represent[s] placebo or nonspecific effects." > > > > > > Limitations of this study include restricting treatment to only the > > > needling > > > component of traditional Chinese acupuncture, predetermined number and > > > duration of treatments, limited conversation between the acupuncturists > > > and > > > the patients, and lack of a medical care comparison group. > > > > > > "The reduction in long-term exposure to the potential adverse effects > of > > > medications is an important benefit that may enhance the safety of > > > conventional medical care," the study authors write. "The number of > > > patients > > > who would need to be treated with insertive or superficial acupuncture > > > stimulation to result in 1 person achieving meaningful improvement in > > > function ranges from 5 (for short-term benefits) to 8 (for persisting > > > benefits)." > > > > > > A National Institutes of Health Cooperative Agreement with the National > > > Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine funded this study. > > > Lhasa > > > OMS, Inc, Weymouth, Massachusetts, donated the Seirin acupuncture > > needles > > > used in this study. The study authors have disclosed no relevant > > > financial > > > relationships. > > > > > > Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:858-866. > > > > > > > > > > > > Open minded means being open to evidence. > > > Being open minded to things with no evidence means you've let your > > > brain fall out. > > > > > > Note: the 'open minded' defence is the classic tactic of alties. It > > > signals that you have no evidence and therefore no argument, but just > > > want to try and make the other person look bad. It's the equivalent of > > > saying 'can't you take a joke' to someone you've just insulted. > > > > > > Acupuncture has been extensively studied, as has the 'life force' and > > > auras. See the James Randi Educational Foundation website, and more > > > importantly, follow the challenge link on the site and see what > > > happens when this stuff is put to the test. > > > > > > I'm open minded - offer me reproducible positive studies, and > > > falsifiable data, and I will change my mind in an instant. Belief > > > should be reserved for religion, if you are that way inclined. > > > > > > Fiona. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/06/2009, at 6:50 PM, Lorick Fox, MPAS, PA-C wrote: > > > > > > > Absence of proof is not proof of absence. > > > > I tend to suspect that you are right, but as it has NOT been studied > > > > (although there is some work comparing reports of "aura" among > > > > people who > > > > claimed to able to perceive such and it was neither consistent nor > > > > supportive of their claims). > > > > > > > > I therefore reserve judgment. > > > > I view keeping an open mind is the scientific approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lorick Fox, MPAS, PA-C > > > > Gianaclis Support Complex > > > > +20-3-448-2335 or +20-45-240-9450 > > > > Fax +20-45-243-1191 > > > > Mobile +20-18-230-4448 > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/>] > > > >> Subject: Re: Alternative therapies (OT) > > > >> > > > >> There is no such thing as 'life energy' except the stuff that comes > > > >> out of defibrillator paddles (and then only when it works) > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > > > > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > > > > -- > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > > > > -- > > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > -- > > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- The one important thing I have learned over the years is the difference between taking one's work seriously and taking one's self seriously. The first is imperative and the second is disastrous. Margot Fonteyn
- Previous message: Alternative therapies (OT)
- Next message: Alternative therapies (OT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
