Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Trauma Care in Europe
Mathias Kalkum listen at doc-kalkum.deMon Jun 8 18:42:18 BST 2009
- Previous message: Trauma Care in Europe
- Next message: AW: Trauma Care in Europe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken, as so often your post offers plenty of insightful views and information. Thank you very much for summing things up for us! In addition to what others have already said (Tim, I concur your experience of medical training in Europe) I would like to comment one thing or the other. > Many of the above medical professional persons are listed due to the NON > STANDARDIZED nomenclature of physicians in Europe and the Middle East. > Around the world, but especially in EUROPE there is a great need for a > standardization of nomenclature as to what physicians are called. The ever bureaucratic monster of the EU is very slowly addressing this by challenging its members to accept medical titles awarded by other members. On the long run this will force a universal medical language. However, there is already effort undertaken to make surgical training within Europe (not only the EU!) comparable. You might want to have a look here <http://www.uemssurg.org/index.jsp>. > I was struck with the protectiveism of the word "trauma" and just who owned > it. Sigh! Yes, you are so right. However, that is nothing against the battle who is the genuine "general surgeon". Spinger's "Der Chirurg" filled almost one issue with this a year or so ago. > In each country, different specialist tended to want to "own" the > term "trauma" for their discipline. No where did this seem to be more > volatile than in Germany where the orthopedist who does almost exclusively > bones, joints, and soft tissue wanted to continue to solely own the term > trauma. This may be an over simplification on my understanding, but it seemed > to me that if the German orthopedic surgeons would merely call themselves > orthopedic surgeons with interenst in "______" (pick any term), much > progress would be made in Europe - snip - As Frank has said so nicely - and were Marie-Anne is definitely wrong - the decades long battle on who's the real trauma surgeon is slowly coming to an end. About 20 years ago I started my training in orthopedics. We had about 40% trauma patients then, including our share in MVC victims. During this time "Unfallchirurgie", which perhaps is best translated as accident surgery, started its rise. As far as I can see under great influence of the US trauma system. And eventually both specialties are in the process of melting up into one single profession. It is just that - at least in my humble view - the question who will eventually will be the leader in trauma remains open. If memory serves it was you, Ken, who suggested the general surgeon as the natural leader in trauma surgery - because he is a generalist; certainly from an American point of view. But that is - see above - another animal. Just my 2 cents. Mathias
- Previous message: Trauma Care in Europe
- Next message: AW: Trauma Care in Europe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
