Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Centrist vs Local Social Systems
Gross, Ronald Ronald.Gross at baystatehealth.orgTue Jul 28 12:51:33 BST 2009
- Previous message: Centrist vs Local Social Systems
- Next message: Centrist vs Local Social Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Norm, I too will place my last words on this subject in writing, 'cause I actually have to work to get paid. Thanks to Ken for all of the behind the scenes work that he has and is doing to help with the reform, and thanks to both of you - and many others on the list - for keeping this discussion going in a professional and respectful manner. There are some on the list that could learn from that. Best wishes, Ron ________________________________ From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of McSwain, Norman E Jr. Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 10:45 PM To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG] Subject: RE: Centrist vs Local Social Systems As a brief follow up. Katrina was a disaster by all participants... no one was prepared. When Gustov and Ike came along, both the private hospital system (HCA) and the public hospital system ( Charity Hospitals) did a great job. the federal government system (FEMA), failed again. That is what worries me I have had my say on this subject. Well yes.... one more word. Ken is very much on top of these problems. Ken, thank you for keeping us abreast of the current crisis. Norman Norman McSwain MD Trauma Director, Charity Hospital Professor of Surgery, Tulane University New Orleans LA 504 988 5111 norman.mcswain at tulane.edu<mailto:norman.mcswain at tulane.edu> ________________________________ From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org on behalf of KMATTOX at aol.com Sent: Mon 7/27/2009 7:53 PM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Re: Centrist vs Local Social Systems FIONA: It seems that is you that in your post have shifted the goal posts from the government being the enemy or the one rushing to change the regulation TO THE INSURANCE COMPANY AS BEING THE BIG SATIN, and creating rules which are unfair to hospitals, doctors, and patients, and denying care, increasing the hassle factor, while taking 25% profit off the top. Otherwise, it seems to me that you and Norm and supporting the same concept. Remember, it is possible to have a government as a protector, not a provider, and in that protection, they can collect money, such as user fees, etc. and distribute those dollars to local areas for local solutions to local problems. That is done in so many areas of our society. Where the Centrist Government in our country or any others get into the personal aspects of peoples lives (religion, banking, health care, education, etc), it gets all fuzzy and inefficient. If you liked what FEMA did for the country and for individuals after Katrina, you are going to love HEALTH CARE under our centrist government in the United States. k In a message dated 7/27/2009 7:42:47 P.M. Central Standard Time, tielserrath at yahoo.co.uk writes: If you're going to make a case for this you need to stop shifting the goalposts. First govt employees have no incentive to be productive, now govt systems are simply 'unworkable'. Obama is going to make the health system 'unworkable' like the others. What, exactly, do you mean? There seems to be a lot of complaining about possible changes, but very little factual evidence about why those changes will, or will not, work. Just the inevitable 'private good, government bad' that seems to pass for rational discussion in the States nowadays. Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that the govt is currently bailing out the private sector with billions of dollars that could have been better used elsewhere. As Pret has pointed out, working only in high-level trauma care offers a somewhat skewed view of the health system. Only a tiny minority of the population ever requires these services. What is important is excellent primary care and appropriate and timely access to secondary care on an inpatient and outpatient basis. Plus being able to change employment without having to worry about losing health insurance. And rationalisation of preventive treatment - which inevitably means making it free - to reduce costs further downstream, without letting moralising interfere. Fiona. On 28/07/2009, at 8:45 AM, McSwain, Norman E Jr. wrote: > I know that that are plenty of workable systems elsewhere. I am > lucky enough to see some of them at work. The reality however is now > we are faced at making the US system work without bankrupting the > entire country. Our president has suggested a system that does not > improve the healthcare provided but only shifts the cost to the > government from the privates. Like it or not, we cannot suddenly > make ours like others. Unfortunately that is what he is trying to do > but without looking at the whole picture. We have several unworkable > government systems Making the healthcare system unworkable like the > others will be very BAD for our patients. He is changing the good > without changing the bad and making a system that will be much more > expensive than our current one. > Norman > > Norman McSwain MD > Trauma Director, Charity Hospital > Professor of Surgery, Tulane University > New Orleans LA > 504 988 5111 > norman.mcswain at tulane.edu <mailto:norman.mcswain at tulane.edu> > > ________________________________ > > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org on behalf of Fiona Wallace > Sent: Mon 7/27/2009 5:25 PM > To: Trauma-List [TRAUMA.ORG] > Subject: Re: Centrist vs Local Social Systems > > > > Capitalists seem to struggle with the concept that there are many of > us in the health service for whom a fat paycheck is not the driving > force. The vast majority of people I have worked with both in medicine > and nursing consider it primarily vocational. > > There are doctors and nurses in many first world countries who work > for a salary that most in the States would consider risible, yet do an > excellent job within a variety of systems. The nursing staff I > currently work with are all on permanent contracts as government > employees, yet there is no dead wood and everyone, without exception, > works well and extremely hard. > > Sorry, Norman - you need to step outside your own system and see what > is really possible elsewhere. > > [because after all, Goldman-Sachs is such a shining example of how > private banking has done so much for the ordinary American. http://www.smirkingchimp.com/author/matt_taibbi > ] > > Fiona > > > > > > > On 27/07/2009, at 7:35 AM, McSwain, Norman E Jr. wrote: > >> Sorry to disagree but I think it is the system that has failed or >> has allowed the entity to fail. There are many other well known >> similar systems that failed when they have become 'federalized' . >> One of these is well known medical system and the other one is a >> travel agency. Both of these systems started off with very good >> intentions until the members lost the incentive to be productive and >> were just looking for a place to remain protected and get their >> paycheck. More interested in the paycheck than the service that they >> were supposed to provide to the public. But of course that is a >> person opinion from one who is capitalist who believes in being >> required to be productive in order to get paid. >> >> Norman >> >> Norman McSwain MD >> Trauma Director, Charity Hospital >> Professor of Surgery, Tulane University >> New Orleans LA >> 504 988 5111 >> norman.mcswain at tulane.edu <mailto:norman.mcswain at tulane.edu> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org on behalf of Doc Holiday >> Sent: Sun 7/26/2009 2:24 PM >> To: .Trauma List >> Subject: RE: Centrist vs Local Social Systems >> >> >> >> >> From: nmcswai at tulane.edu >> >> >>> left out the other 'wonderful' social system...US postal service... >> >> ==> When it comes to nationally sponsored bodies he may have also >> left out the US Military and the judicial system, not only the >> USPS... There are success stories and failures, be they among >> capitalist entities or "socialised" ones or "federalised" ones; >> likely therefore that it is the entities which are at fault, not the >> sysem within which they live. The UK postal office is not held up as >> an example of success either. >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Windows Live Messenger: Happy 10-Year Anniversary-get free winks and >> emoticons. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/ >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> >> >> <winmail.dat>-- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > <winmail.dat>-- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823322x1201398723/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd =JulystepsfooterNO115) -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at (413) 794-0000 and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. For further information regarding Baystate Health's privacy policy, please visit our Internet web site at http://www.baystatehealth.com.
- Previous message: Centrist vs Local Social Systems
- Next message: Centrist vs Local Social Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
