Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
reimaging transfer patients
William Bromberg brombwi1 at memorialhealth.comSun Jan 11 13:22:36 GMT 2009
- Previous message: reimaging transfer patients
- Next message: reimaging transfer patients
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We routinely rescan patients for these reasons. 1. Often the referring facilities scanners are sub-par 2. Often the disks sent with the patient are either unreadable (becoming less common now) or the images have been degraded significantly. They certainly do not allow for reformatting/reconstruction 3. Many times the studies are done non-contrasted. 4. The referring facility reports never come with the patient (like all rads reports the formal report doesn't happen for 24hrs — don't get me started on the fact that the radiologist can bill for picking up a pneumothorax 24hrs after I've already treated it). and in response to this --> I'd think that this would be criminal, as it amounts to irradiating a patient for money and no other benefit to the patient. If your system is so "lovely" that your radiologists will refuse and you are even thinking of this, then you should put the patient through a "dummy" scan without irradiation, bill it as a proper scan and THEN get the radiologist to report the original images and bill as if he's reporting new ones... I don't know what the malpractice situation is like in Oz but expecting physicians to accept the liability without any reimbursement is not only fundamentally unfair IMO but in fact will just not happen in most facilities. There certainly should be a "transferred patient overread" CPT code but in the government's infinite wisdom there is not. Performing a "dummy scan" and billing for it would be considered knowingly fraudulent behavior in the US and would result in fines and prison terms. Even in "Club Fed" type prisons that'd be no fun. Bill Bromberg >>> "brenildo" <brenildo33 at uol.com.br> 1/11/2009 6:47 AM >>> PERFECT BENILDO TAVARES md brenildo33 at uol.com.br RIO DE JANEIRO BRASIL ----- Original Message ----- From: "McSwain, Norman E Jr." <nmcswai at tulane.edu> To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 6:09 PM Subject: RE: reimaging transfer patients Sometimes they do and sometimes they do not, but a surgeon should never operate on a patient without reviewing the radiographs him(her) self. It is very helpful to do this review with a radiologist to be sure that everything is discussed Norman Norman McSwain Jr, MD FACS Trauma Director Charity Hospital Professor of Surgery Tulane University School of Medicine 504 988 5111 -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Doc Holiday Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 2:05 PM To: .Trauma List Subject: RE: reimaging transfer patients From: joe.nemeth at mcgill.ca> What do people do regarding transferred patients coming in with imaging on CD and radiology refusing to read (cannot double dip, hence no pay, hence no read)... --> Sorry. This might be a stupid question, so forgive a foreigner... Don't the radiologists from the institution which created the images report them? Why not get them to send the report on the same CD? > Do you rescan the patient only to have it now read by the happy > radiologist? --> I'd think that this would be criminal, as it amounts to irradiating a patient for money and no other benefit to the patient. If your system is so "lovely" that your radiologists will refuse and you are even thinking of this, then you should put the patient through a "dummy" scan without irradiation, bill it as a proper scan and THEN get the radiologist to report the original images and bill as if he's reporting new ones... Then go take whatever you take to keep sane working in such a system... > Do you have a system in place where imaging from outside can be accessed > by your own radiologist, i.e. function on a same database system --> I am not aware of ANY system which is unable to store images on CD for patient transfer. All modern ones are capable of image transfer via network, but your institutions must be properly connected and interfaced to receive these images, i.e. they need to be linked. But you could not buy a system nowadays which cannot be linked. _________________________________________________________________ Imagine a life without walls. See the possibilities http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/122465943/direct/01/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida. Verificado por AVG - http://www.avgbrasil.com.br Versão: 8.0.197 / Banco de dados de vírus: 270.10.5/1885 - Data de Lançamento: 9/1/2009 19:59 -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: reimaging transfer patients
- Next message: reimaging transfer patients
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
