Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL
Robert Smith rfsmithmd at comcast.netFri Apr 24 12:55:02 BST 2009
- Previous message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, best to do it early and open in the unstable pt. so you can see you're sampling. Rob On Apr 24, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Gross, Ronald wrote: > I would agree with your last statement but I am not sure I would > trust the DPL in the unstable pelvic fracture, especially if some > inexperienced person does the DPL below the umbilicus. That being > said, I would also be concerned that the DPL is going to take you to > the OR for an intra-peritoneal rupture of the unstable open pelvic > fracture in a patient with no other need for laparotomy (unless, of > course you are going to have to pack the pelvis) > > Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > ] On Behalf Of Zsolt Balogh > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:58 AM > To: karimbrohi at gmail.com; trauma-list at trauma.org > Subject: Re: trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL > > It is good if the saline is pouring out through the chest > tube....quite rare... > > Where competent FAST is available in blunt trauma: > DPA (not DPL) has some limited role in haemodynamically unstable > pelvic fracture patients to triage between abdomen and pelvis. > DPL (not DPA) has some limited role to exclude or diagnose hollow > viscus injury in cases of haemodynamically normal intubated/head > injured/intoxicated/uncooperative patient with some pockets of free > fluid between the bowel loops without more suggestion of bowel > injury. Here you test for AP, Amylase, WCC and not interested in the > RBC. > > Best Regards, > > Zsolt Balogh > > > >>>> Karim Brohi <karimbrohi at gmail.com> 04/24/09 8:46 PM >>> > Rob > I don't think that honestly in this day and age anyone uses DPL to > rule out diaphragmatic injuries. It is neither sensitive nor > specific. I'm not sure anywhere but Cook County really ever used it > like this? > Karim > > On 04/24/2009, Robert Smith <rfsmithmd at comcast.net> wrote: >> Tim, >> >> The reason to use DPL to R/O diaphragmatic injuries is that you >> avoid the >> OR/anesthesia event, if there is in fact no injury. >> >> For the tracts of penetrating injuries perhaps we're agreeing? If the >> information you get from the CT is unclear or you're not confident >> of it >> because of the mechanism, then a DPL will answer the question of >> penetration. This assumes that you will operate on a SW to the back >> with a >> positive DPL indicating the missile has passed through the >> retroperitoneum >> into the peritoneal cavity. >> >> Rob >> >> >> On Apr 24, 2009, at 4:45 AM, Dr Timothy Hardcastle wrote: >> >>> Rob and Rob >>> >>> For the ?-penetrated diaphragm the Laparoscope is probably the way >>> to go, >>> but if this is not fairly easily accessible then DPL certainly is >>> a viable >>> option. >>> >>> For the other two scenarios you sketch I will agree that CT is the >>> best >>> option to follow the tract in the bullet injury group. It is not >>> the best >>> for stabs, however, with a higher "miss rate", particularly if >>> there is >>> not enteric contrast, which is not routine in most places anymore. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Tim >>> Dr T C Hardcastle >>> M.B., Ch.B. (Stell); M. Med. (Chir) (Stell); FCS (SA) >>> Principal Specialist Trauma Surgeon / >>> Honorary Lecturer University of KwaZulu-Natal Dept Surgery >>> Deputy Director - IALCH Trauma Service >>> Durban - South Africa >>> >>> >>>> Rob, >>>> >>>> No not unstable. We have FAST. CT isn't good for picking up >>>> penetrating injuries to the diaphragm which, unlike blunt injuries, >>>> may often have no other signs. Fast isn't sensitive enough to >>>> pick up >>>> what would be the equivalent of a few cc of blood to give 10k rbc >>>> indicating penetration. The other two scenarios are when CT didn't >>>> answer the question of penetration. >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> On Apr 23, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Rob Ojala wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Dr Smith, >>>>> Fortunately we don't see a huge amount of penetrating trauma, so >>>>> my >>>>> expertise for the DPL indications you quote is limited. I wonder >>>>> for >>>>> the >>>>> scenarios you quote....are we talking about patients who are too >>>>> unstable to get a CT? [while I realise that CT has limited >>>>> sensitivity >>>>> for Diaphragmatic penetration- it can usually pick up secondary >>>>> features >>>>> of injury [stranding /free fluid etc]]. >>>>> Do you have rapid bedside ultrasound available at your >>>>> institution? >>>>> If too unstable AND no FAST...perhaps DPA...but DPL?? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Rob Ojala >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >>> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >>> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >>> >> >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments > may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of > the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this > communication in error and that any review, disclosure, > dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please > reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at (413) 794-0000 > and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. > For further information regarding Baystate Health's privacy policy, > please visit our Internet web site at http://www.baystatehealth.com. > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 70, Issue 20-DPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
