Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Anaesthesia - how big a pneumothorax before you site a drain pre-op?
Blueflightmedic trauma at emergencyunit.comFri Sep 19 23:05:11 BST 2008
- Previous message: Anaesthesia - how big a pneumothorax before you site a drain pre-op?
- Next message: Needle Decompression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, I will, especially if nitrous oxide may be used. I commonly see a normal(ish) chest film without any evidence of a pneumothorax and then a large obvious but ANTERIOR air collection on CT. Remember - air rises! Best Wishes, Rowley. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of MARK FORREST Sent: 16 September 2008 23:17 To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Re:Anaesthesia - how big a pneumothorax before you site a drain pre-op? A real bug bear of mine is colleagues who insist on putting a chest drain inevery casualty with even the slightest pneumothorax, who is going to theatre for an anaesthetic. When I sat my Fellowship, many moons ago, any suggestion of anaesthesia in such patientswithout a chest drain was a reason for a re-sit next time! So what about current views? How big can that pneumo be on the chest film before you would electively drain before anaesthesia.....does it depend on IPPV vs spontaneous, use of N2O or air or what are your criteria?? If you can get reliable access to the chest in theatre would you just sit tight and observe, whilst they fix the ankle or other minor trauma? Comments? Mark F UK ----- Original Message ---- From: Robert Waddell II <bobwaddell at bresnan.net> To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Tuesday, 16 September, 2008 8:11:16 PM Subject: Re: Needle Decompression Thanks Tim, I'll try to get the paper. Your comments have a greater volume than some may see in that the classic signs, especially those listed in most of the text, include deviated trachea. I believe it was Lee in the 80's who showed through a large post evaluation analysis that tracheal deviation occurred in non-viable (dead) patients and was an extremely late sign and demonstrated that looking for the deviation wasted time and aided in the practitioner loosing focus of the treatable injuries. Maybe it is time for main stream EMS to re-think the "why we do what we do" and get back to a stronger focus on the patient we're caring for and their positive outcomes. Thanks again. Take care, Bob bobwaddell at bresnan.net 307 920 2020 On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Coats Tim - Professor of Emergency Medicine wrote: > > Several posts on this thread have mentioned the 'classic' signs of > tension pneumothorax. However there is a very good paper from the > Emergency Medicine Journal in 2005 that should make you rethink and > question. See: > > Leigh-Smith S, Harris T. Tension pneumothoraxtime for a rethink? > EMJ 2005;22:816. > > What SImon and Tim showed was that 'classic' signs of tension > pneumothorax are based on operative experience in an anaesthetised > patient, where compensatory mechanisms have been reduced. In the non- > anaesthetised patient there may be a number of compensatory > mechanisms which means that the 'classic' signs may well not be > present. My experience is that in a non-anaesthetised patient the > 'classic' signs of tension pneumothorax only occur periarrest. > > On the issue of 'does field needle thorocostomy work?' my experience > is yes, but only very occasionally. It is certainly not as important > an intervention as some prehospital trauma courses make out. > > Tim Coats. > Professor of Emergency Medicine. > Leicester University, UK. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: McSwain, Norman E Jr. [mailto:nmcswai at tulane.edu] > Sent: Tue 9/16/2008 4:14 PM > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: RE: Needle Decompression > > See my comments from the two previous postings this morning. I would > only add that I have used it several times in the field myself with > apparent success. I say apparent because there were no radiographs to > prove a anatomical pathophysiological improvement. General improvement > in the patient's condition that made me believe that something had > been > accomplished by it > > Norman > > Norman McSwain Jr, MD FACS > Trauma Director Charity Hospital > Professor of Surgery > Tulane University School of Medicine > 504 988 5111 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of kmattox at aol.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:23 AM > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: Re: Needle Decompression > > I for one have never been impressed, nor seen real benefit from needle > decompression of the chest. > > K > > > > ------Original Message------ > From: Dr Ross Hofmeyr > Sender: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' > ReplyTo: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Sent: Sep 16, 2008 9:04 AM > Subject: RE: Needle Decompression > >> You put >> in in for proper indications ( decreased breath sounds, >> decreased oxygenation) then is doing its job allowing the >> lung to expand (blood or air they both can compress the >> lung). > > *Screeches to halt* > > Holdonamminit - how, pray tell, does a cannula in the chest help the > lung > expand? Do you mean a cannula PLUS non-return valve of some form? > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > > This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential > and / or privileged information and is intended for the exclusive > use of the addressee(s) printed above. If you are not the > addressee(s), any unauthorised review, disclosure, reproduction, > other dissemination or use of this e-mail, or taking of any action > in reliance upon the information contained herein, is strictly > prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please > return to the sender. No guarantee can be given that the contents of > this email are virus free - The University Hospitals of Leicester > NHS Trust cannot be held responsible for any failure by the > recipient(s) to test for viruses before opening any attachments. The > information contained in this e-mail may be the subject of public > disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - unless > legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail > and your reply cannot be guaranteed. Copyright in this email and any > attachments created by us remains vested in the University Hospitals > of Leicester NHS Trust. > <winmail.dat>-- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Anaesthesia - how big a pneumothorax before you site a drain pre-op?
- Next message: Needle Decompression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
