Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
The "Panel"
Stephen Richey stephen.richey at gmail.comSat Oct 11 22:22:24 BST 2008
- Previous message: The "Panel"
- Next message: Block that PUNT (and panel)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, but convincing a city/township/county/etc NOT to offer a service is far more difficult, especially given the misinformed opinion of many members of the public about helicopters. Try to get the local board to hinder the operation of the helicopters and the companies will whip the local residents into a fervor through a disinformation campaign. The most effective way to reduce excessive use (other than getting insurance companies to refuse to pay for the excessive transports) is to convince local medical directors to establish policies that all cases flown (or requested to be flown) will be flagged for expedited review and if inappropriate requests for the helicopter will result in disciplinary action up to and including termination. This was the approach used by my former medical director to great effect. The other option is to get states to define this sort of behavior (if a habit is made of it) as a violation of professional conduct by way of refusing to obey legitimate medical direction orders and to instill the fear of recourse in the average prehospital provider. This would help to offset the attempts by the helicopter companies to buy the favor of EMS personnel with pizza, rides and trinkets, especially among those who rely upon EMS for their income. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:11 PM, <ALS79 at aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated 10/11/2008 3:51:21 PM Central Daylight Time, > stephen.richey at gmail.com writes: > > > > "I was pointing more towards the issue that the government does not have > > specific powers to limit the creation of a business so long as it does > not > > violate existing laws (monopoly, safety, etc). They lack the authority > to > > say "This area already has enough helicopters" or at very least, they are > > loathe to enforce such regulations." > > > > County and municipal governments frequently grant exclusive EMS franchises > through the use of uniform ordinances and inter-local cooperative > agreements. > Such franchise agreements (contracts) control the level of care, response > times > and other areas - all in the name of cost containment and protecting the > public. And, these franchises have withstood appellate challenge. However, > controlling the airspace, landing rights and patient care of HEMS may be > another > matter altogether. But, there is precedent. > > Bob Kellow > > > ************** > New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your > destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out > (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002) > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- Stephen L. Richey, CRT Aviation Injury Research Project Leader Saginaw Valley State University Work E-mail: slrichey at svsu.edu Home Office Phone: 248-366-4452 "It is the characteristic excellence of the strong man that he can bring momentous issues to the fore and make a decision about them. The weak are always forced to decide between alternatives they have not chosen themselves."- Dietrich Bonhoeffer
- Previous message: The "Panel"
- Next message: Block that PUNT (and panel)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
