Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Maryland Air Ambulance Review Panel
Bryan Bledsoe bbledsoe at earthlink.netTue Nov 25 18:48:38 GMT 2008
- Previous message: Maryland Air Ambulance Review Panel
- Next message: Maryland Air Ambulance Review Panel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
A couple of thoughts after reading these posts and having spent hours in meetings over these issues. 1. Dr. Bass and staff want to fix any problems in Maryland. I am convinced of that. They are in political positions, but they are physicians and good people. The panel was not paid and MIEMSS staff was not a part of the process nor did they try and influence the process. 2. The panel was well-balanced although the time was short. The members of the panel worked collegially and diligently and we were surprisingly on the same page. 3. This panel was to look at Maryland issues. We would be naïve to think that other states were not watching. However, we were here for the people of Maryland. 4. The panel's recommendations are only recommendations and will go to the Maryland EMS Board. The report is incomplete and may change. 5. There were numerous recommendations and these were by no means a "whitewash" as some have implied. 6. Recommendations included making a transition from a response time oriented system to a critical care provision system. Also, MSP should become CAMTS accredited and obtain their own Part 135 and fly under FAR Part 135 at all times (for EMS missions). These recommendations will mandate fundamental changes in the system and culture including two medical crew members. The number of helicopters appears to be excessive in this area (MD, VA, DC, PA). It is up to the people of Maryland to decide how many they want and how many they are willing to pay for. There is a point of diminished return after a critical number of helicopters have been placed. A task force with experts in asset placement should look at that. There is a difference between helicopter triages and trauma center triage. These are often confused. The C&D category patients are currently being screened by a physician and this seems to be working as flights are now decreased. Flights are already being reduced and will be reduced further making a large number of helicopters unnecessary. The HEMS system needs to look at non-traumatic time-sensitive conditions as well (e.g., STEMI, stroke, neurosurgical vascular lesions). The ghost of Cowley haunts Maryland in that everything is trauma, trauma, trauma. The trauma surgeons (John and Bob) and Steve, Tom, Bill and Ellen each brought something unique to the table. What resulted is a good review for Maryland and I commend the MIEMSS people, Dr. Bass, Dr. Flocare and others. I am sure that this was painful for them but I am sure their intentions and dedication are genuine. >From a "helicopter critic".... Bryan Bryan Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Clinical Professor of Emergency Medicine University of Nevada School of Medicine University Medical Center
- Previous message: Maryland Air Ambulance Review Panel
- Next message: Maryland Air Ambulance Review Panel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
