Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Laparoscopy in trauma
McSwain, Norman E Jr. nmcswai at tulane.eduSat Nov 22 16:30:09 GMT 2008
- Previous message: Laparoscopy in trauma
- Next message: New CPR Tune
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There is very little if any use for the laparoscopy in the primary assessment and management of either blunt or penetrating trauma of the abdomen. That having been said, let me explain my views: my first research on this device was in the mid 1970's. This was reported and subsequently published. This was a needlescope inserted under local anesthesia in the ED for the assessment of blunt trauma. We found that it took longer, was more expensive and took longer than diagnostic peritoneal lavage and the assessment results were the same. Therefore it was not pursued, as a diagnostic technique. To my knowledge this was the first reported use of laparoscopy in the care of the trauma patient Fast forward 30 years to 2008. To assess the abdominal cavity for the need of surgical management one needs to look for two types of injuries: ongoing hemorrhage and GI tract injuries. 1) Gross hemorrhage can be found with a variety of means that are less costly and with less complication than a laparoscope. DPL is the most accurate but not necessarily the best for hemorrhage that requires operative management. It has an over triage factor. DPL identifies the presence of blood but not the presence of ONGOING hemorrhage. However, neither CT nor FAST can do this either. 2) the other needed assessment is injury to the GI tract. In the hands of most operators, it requires 2-4 hours to run the small bowel and accurately rule out injury using the laparoscopy. Yes, one can assess the presence of abdominal perforation in penetrating trauma with a laparoscope but the mere presence of peritoneal penetration does not indicate the need for surgical repair. Nance in 1969 and Shafton in 1974, both demonstrated this, as well as, the superiority of a standard physical examination and frequent follow-up examinations as more accurate than other techniques. With the advent of other technologies FAST, CT or CTA there is still nothing that exceeds the accuracy that Nance and Shafton described almost 40 years ago. VOMIT (to use the Mattox phrase). Why put a patient to sleep for a laparotomy when serial examinations can produce the same outcome without the complications The management of hemorrhage and the repair of GI tract injures is far more difficult with a laparoscope than with an open abdomen A 30 minute, skin to skin, exploratory laparotomy can do assessment (and management, if necessary) as quick as, with cheaper costs over all costs, and less complications than a laparoscopy under general anesthesia. This is in those cases the physical examination, hard signs physiological conditions are equivocal. Why do a laparoscopy, when the accuracy is not as good and the injuries cannot be repaired as well, it is not as fast as, and it is probably more expensive when compared to a laparotomy. Thus my initial statement-----"There is very little if any use for the laparoscopy in the primary assessment and management of either blunt or penetrating trauma of the abdomen" VATS is different. It can be used for the management of hemorrhage in most chest injuries. It can be used to identify diaphragmatic perforation ( and the potential need for a laparotomy). And it is cheaper in complications, time and money than a thoracotomy The chest and abdomen are two different cavities, two different types of problems tow different kinds of complications and two different outcomes. Do not try to compare these in the same thought process Norman Norman McSwain Jr, MD FACS Trauma Director Charity Hospital Professor of Surgery Tulane University School of Medicine 504 988 5111 -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of rm khattar Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:05 AM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Laparoscopy in trauma Let me refine my question. 1.Role of Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. 2.Role of VATS in thoracic trauma. R.M.Khattar. India. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Laparoscopy in trauma
- Next message: New CPR Tune
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
