Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Presumptive Antibiotic Administration And Chest Tube Insertion.
Robert F Smith rfsmithmd at comcast.netSat Nov 1 12:44:50 GMT 2008
- Previous message: Presumptive Antibiotic Administration And Chest Tube Insertion.
- Next message: D5% and head trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BTW, what is the empyema rate for chest tubes placed in a resuscitative setting? Or rate of pneumonia vs. pneumonia for similar ICU patients without chest tubes? (Since you already did the work, so I won't have to, lol) Rob Smith -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hammond Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 1:19 AM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Cc: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Re: Presumptive Antibiotic Administration And Chest Tube Insertion. Agree with Dr Mattox...but...the problem is most of the papers have chosen the wrong end-point to study. Empyema is such an uncommon event that, as Ken points out, it would take a huge study to show a significant reduction. However, we looked at this 5 or so years ago in an effort to develop an internal consensus and there was literature that suggested that antibiotic administration with a 1st generation cepha-drug was associated with a lower pneumonia rate. That has been our practice. Jeffrey Hammond MD, MPH New Brunswick, NJ ----- Original Message ----- From: KMATTOX at aol.com Date: Friday, October 31, 2008 6:47 pm Subject: Re: Presumptive Antibiotic Administration And Chest Tube Insertion. To: trauma-list at trauma.org > There is NO good data on EITHER side of this > question. It would take 20 > years and somewhere close to 500,000 cases to reach some sort of even > crude statistical power, because empyema from an uncomplicated tube > thoracostomy is > so incrediably low. > So.........over time there has been an agreement that if one is to use > any antibiotic at all, it should be one that has minimal > complications. My own recommendation is the > CHEAPEST oral FIRST GENERATION > cephalosomething in your city's or hospital's > pharmacy. NO, NO, NO, do not > sneak in a second generation cephalosporin, or anything > any stronger. It > simply in not necessary. > > k > > > > > In a message dated 10/31/2008 2:06:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > Richard.Ferraro at chw.edu writes: > > Rick Ferraro Trauma Program Manager Mercy San Juan Medical Center > > > > Question: I want to get feed back on your practice as it > pertains to one > time antibiotic administration before chest tube insertion > for blunt or > penetrating trauma. > > > > I hope this finds all well! > > > > > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > **************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. > Check out Today's Hot > 5 Travel Deals! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol?redir=htt http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2008-November/p://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001) > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Presumptive Antibiotic Administration And Chest Tube Insertion.
- Next message: D5% and head trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
