Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Fw: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations
Timothy Craig Hardcastle TimothyHar at ialch.co.zaThu Jul 31 07:14:33 BST 2008
- Previous message: [CCM-L] Request for Articles
- Next message: Re to mc swain: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic kneedislocations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Norman I agree with you - ABI or comparative pulse pressures (side to side) <0.9 is in need of further evaluation. One's finger is not always sensitive enough to feel such a subtle deficit. Maybe Eric F has very sensitive fingers, but he "poopood" the use of non-invasive testing. I, however, believe in it. Norman, the pulses were reported present bilaterally if I recall Sal's original post. Regards Tim Dr Timothy C Hardcastle M.B., Ch.B. (Stell); M. Med (Chir) (Stell); FCS (SA) Principal Surgeon-Lecturer / Sub-specialist: Trauma and Critical Care Deputy director: Trauma Unit and Trauma ICU Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital / UKZN 800 Bellair Road Mayville, Durban Postal: PostNet Suite 27 Private Bag X05 Malvern, 4055 KwaZulu Natal timothyhar at ialch.co.za -----Original Message----- From: McSwain, Norman E Jr. [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of McSwain, Norman E Jr. Sent: 31 July 2008 02:11 To: Trauma & Subject: RE: Fw: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations The question of the initial PxEx has not been answered. What were the pulses? and what was the ABI? Norman Norman McSwain MD Trauma Director, Charity Hospital Professor of Surgery, Tulane University New Orleans LA 504 988 5111 norman.mcswain at tulane.edu <mailto:norman.mcswain at tulane.edu> _____ From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org on behalf of Errington Thompson Sent: Wed 7/30/2008 5:22 PM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Fw: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations Rob - I think that you are right. The question is what would have happened if Sal elected to watch that injury? Would it have clotted off? Would it re-model and had been fine? E Errington C. Thompson, MD Trauma/Surgical Critical Care Talk Show Host - WPEK www.whereistheoutrage.net Asheville, NC -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Smith Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:44 AM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Fw: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations This is the abstract of Eric's study on this particular injury and the utility of physical exam as a screening tool. I realize I'm not the student of or contributor to the literature as many of this list's members. But have his many studies on peripheral, and later, more central vascular injuries been refuted? Not to speak for him but it's as if the bugaboo of missed injury can never be refuted, even if there were no missed injuries in several studies with pretty good follow up for our patient population. Rob Smith 1: J Trauma. 2002 Feb;52(2):247-51; discussion 251-2. Confirmation of the safety and accuracy of physical examination in the evaluation of knee dislocation for injury of the popliteal artery: a prospective study. Miranda FE, Dennis JW, Veldenz HC, Dovgan PS, Frykberg ER. Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, Florida 32209, USA. BACKGROUND: Knee dislocation, which poses a significant risk for injury of the popliteal artery, prompts many surgeons to evaluate these patients with arteriography routinely. Our hypothesis was that physical examination alone (without arteriography) accurately confirms or excludes surgically significant vascular injuries associated with knee dislocation. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with a knee dislocation by an attending orthopedic surgeon between January 1990 and January 2000 were prospectively managed by protocol at our Level I trauma center according to their physical examination. Those with hard signs (active hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, absent pulse, distal ischemia, bruit/thrill) underwent arteriography followed immediately by surgical repair if indicated. Patients with no hard signs (negative physical examination) were admitted for 23 hours, underwent serial physical examination, and then followed as outpatients. RESULTS: There were 35 knee dislocations in 35 patients during this 10-year period. The average age was 31 years; 18 dislocations were on the right knee and 17 were on the left. Two patients died from closed head injuries and multisystem trauma. Eight patients were found to have hard signs (positive physical examination) either at presentation (six patients) or during their hospitalization after reduction of their dislocation (two patients). All eight patients demonstrated a loss of pulses only. Six of these patients showed occlusion of the popliteal artery on arteriography and underwent surgical repair without complication (five vein grafts, one primary repair), one demonstrated spasm of the popliteal artery, and one showed a normal artery that required no treatment. None of the 27 patients with negative physical examination during their hospitalization ever developed limb ischemia, needed an operation for vascular injury, or experienced limb loss. Sixteen patients were available for follow-up (46%). Twelve patients with negative physical examination (44%) were contacted (mean, 13 months; range, 2-35 months), and four of the eight patients with positive physical examination (50%) and surgical repair were contacted (mean, 19 months; range, 6-49 months). None of the patients in either group developed any vascular-related symptoms or suffered from a vascular repair complication over the follow-up interval. CONCLUSION: This limited series suggests that the presence or absence of an injury of the popliteal artery after knee dislocation can be safely and reliably predicted, with a 94.3% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value. Arteriography appears to be unnecessary when physical examination is negative but may avert negative vascular exploration when physical examination is positive. This approach substantially reduces cost and resource use without adverse impact on the patient. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:09 AM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: Fwd: Fw: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations We are very aggressive in early angiographic evaluation of potential popliteal arterial injury with knee dislocations, even in the absence of hard signs. What has been written for femoral and brachial artery injury does not necessarily apply to the popliteal artery in that a missed injury can result in loss of the lower leg. AND the medical legal consequences are significant. I know that some highly visible persons have had stents placed in their popliteal arteries for aneurysms, but these persons are quite older than the young trauma patient. For the injury shown, we would do a direct revascularization via a saphenous vein graft, probably a jump from distal femoral to distal popliteal, and not interfere with the ligaments around the knee. k ____________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: "Timothy Craig Hardcastle" <TimothyHar at ialch.co.za> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:09:07 To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list<trauma-list at trauma.org> Subject: RE: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations Sal Call me old fashioned, but it is considered negligent by the authorities in South Africa to not angio the posterior knee disloc. I know the counter literature, but your case illustrates the problem - I've seen an occlusion on day 7 of one not angio'ed by a peripheral rural hospital. Luckily we could save the leg. No experience with stent-grafts in Pop vessels personally, but the experience with long-term patency and the need for a secondary intervention with stents for thoracic outlet penetrating injuries (see the work of DF du Toit et. al.) shows that the asymptomatic occlusion rates are fairly high. In the pop segment there is poor collaterals and I would be worried about long-term problems. I suppose the thrombolysis may work, although the question is whether you have recruited any previously dubious muscle? Regards, Tim Dr Timothy C Hardcastle M.B., Ch.B. (Stell); M. Med (Chir) (Stell); FCS (SA) Principal Surgeon-Lecturer / Sub-specialist: Trauma and Critical Care Deputy director: Trauma Unit and Trauma ICU Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital / UKZN 800 Bellair Road Mayville, Durban Postal: PostNet Suite 27 Private Bag X05 Malvern, 4055 KwaZulu Natal timothyhar at ialch.co.za -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of sjasmd at aol.com Sent: 30 July 2008 06:36 To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations I would have enjoyed more discussion of the pros and cons of performing angiography for asymptomatic knee dislocations. It would seem from the few posts that there are some who still perform angiography. We had begun to dismiss this procedure because of an overwhelming amount of fairly good data published in the past decade that showed that signs of vascular injury are almost always present when angiography is positive in detecting popliteal artery injury and that detecting injury in the absence of signs by angiography is uncommon. We recently saw an obese ?patient who dislocated her knee anteriorly who underwent angiography three days after the injury because the orthopedic service wanted angiography prior to planning knee repair. Angiography showed intraluminal thrombus and intimal flaps with thrombus on them?in the midpopliteal artery. Luminal diameter was compromised about 80%. Distal run-off angiography showed occlusion of the entire posterior tibial artery and embolism of the midportion of the peroneal. The anterior tibial artery was normal. see attached We elected to place a stent graft over?the injured segment and trap the thrombus under it.?We introduced? a 22 mm atrium stent and applied it exactly at the site of the injury. Anatomical appearance returned with good flow. patient was discharged the next day and will undergo elective reconstruction of the knee. any comments? about use of angiography for knee dislocations about use of stent graft in popliteal artery about use of thrombolysis for the peroneal embolism thanks SAL SCLAFANI -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: [CCM-L] Request for Articles
- Next message: Re to mc swain: popliteal angiography for asymptomatic kneedislocations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
