Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Flagstaff Tragedy
Jules jkaymdc at aim.comWed Jul 2 18:16:54 BST 2008
- Previous message: Helicopter crashes
- Next message: FOLLOWUP - Cobra bite
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken: > > AGREED! > > Jules > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:53 AM, <KMATTOX at aol.com> wrote: > >> Jules: Good points, but in those areas that had HEMS and GEMS and then >> lost HEMS and where they studied the impact of the LOSS of HEMS before >> and after >> the fact, even for relatively rural and wilderness transports, the HEMS >> made NO DIFFERENCE on survival and outcomes. Many MANY of the >> assumptions >> and foundations to support HEMS are not based on fact and indeed, in and >> of >> themselves need to be re-examed. >> >> k >> >> >> In a message dated 7/2/2008 11:34:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, >> jkaymdc at aim.com writes: >> >> I've watched, read, and listened to the comments about this on here and >> many >> other forums. I just have a couple comments.. >> >> Let me preface it by saying I know things are different everywhere.... >> >> Here in the rural/heartland of America, as it is sometimes called, we are >> AT >> LEAST an hour from any level I or II trauma center. We rely on having >> HEMS >> as a option. I say "option" because over the years, it has become >> increasingly often they will not/can not fly to us anyway. It gets a bit >> more stingent each time there is an accident, which is a good thing! >> However the problem still remains, how do we get the patient to >> definitive >> care in the safest, quickest manner? >> >> Here in Iowa, (NW Iowa specifically), we often transport the patient the >> closest hospital for stablization, because HEMS usually cannot get to the >> scene before we extricate the patient. In the urban setting, I have heard >> people comment how stupid it is to fly someone from a hospital because >> they >> should be stable enough to go by ground...well...walk in our shoes is all >> I >> can say. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. >> >> The pilots have the choice of whether they should fly or not...if no, and >> that happens more often than not, especially following an HEMS accident, >> then the patient is put into the back of a ground ambulance, often times >> with a crew unqualified to monitor the chest tubes, etc....The solution >> for >> a many of these very rural, often times "band-aid" station type of >> hospitals, is to through a nurse in the back with the medics to cover the >> "critical care" transport criteria....unfortunately, the nurse often has >> NO >> CLUE how to do critical care. In fact, I've transported chest tubes with >> a >> nurse present who was a brand new OB nurse grad and had never seen the >> back >> of an ambulance. >> >> So..what is the answer? We like, need and utilize our HEMS here...mostly >> appropriately when following the "protocol" in your service for calling >> the >> helo...is it appropriate they were called to begin with? sometimes not. >> I've >> transported many by ground that have been discharged to home from the ED, >> often times beating the ambulance back home. >> >> Shouldn't we be figuring out what is best for the patient? in some areas >> and >> specific times that is flying them to defiinite care (or frankly just the >> right level of care), Sometimes not. But putting them on the ground for a >> 90 >> minute transport with an OB nurse who doesn't KNOW or want to KNOW how to >> monitor a critical care patient (chest tube, etc puking all the >> way),..isn't >> helping anyone either...except the billing department. >> >> Jules >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Connie Potter < >> Connie at traumafoundation.org> >> wrote: >> >> > The critical comments re: Flagstaff's tragic crash appear to come >> mostly >> > from those least familiar with the rural nature of emergency care and >> > distances, the diminishing numbers of "volunteer EMT's" able to leave >> > their primary catchment area to transport a patient, AND the lack of >> > access to even LIV trauma care in the great mass of this US, but who >> > wish to second guess those who are no longer alive to rebut statements >> > that they flew/died for nothing. >> > >> > Many trauma systems review every airmedical use. Portland OR's ATAB >> > forbids them within 40 miles of the scene because they delay care. >> The >> > rest of the rural American often does not have the luxury of even >> > calling for airmed resources because there are none. Rural hospitals >> > are losing specialists at an alarming rate so patients are being >> > transported for "routine stuff"? Sorry, but not to an FP. >> > >> > No problems with spiders? Where do you live? A Brown Recluse caused >> > one of my patients to lose her arm by the time it necrosed to the bone. >> > This time the unlucky patient was a college student at U of M in >> > Missoula, a firefighter from my home town. We at home will think of >> him >> > as having died in service, thank you very much. >> > >> > Except for a few of this list, the callous comments any time one of >> > flights goes down becomes increasingly demeaning to those who get out >> > daily to place their life and safety on the line. No, we don't try to >> > fly when it is unsafe and we do flight following because it is. My >> > flight crew was in the air on the Columbia Gorge when Mt St. Helens >> > blew: Should we have factored that possibility into all of our flight >> > plans? And if flying is so easy, why did Scott Crossfield die after >> his >> > plane tore apart in a thunderstorm? Even the best don't always make >> it. >> > God Rest Them and Give Them Peace and pray for the survivor. And, >> don't >> > preach unless you've been there. >> > >> > Connie Potter >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org >> > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of >> > trauma-list-request at trauma.org >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 2:37 AM >> > To: trauma-list at trauma.org >> > Subject: Spam:trauma-list Digest, Vol 61, Issue 4 >> > >> > Send trauma-list mailing list submissions to >> > trauma-list at trauma.org >> > >> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> > http://list.mistral.net/mailman/listinfo/trauma-list >> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> > trauma-list-request at trauma.org >> > >> > You can reach the person managing the list at >> > trauma-list-owner at trauma.org >> > >> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> > than "Re: Contents of trauma-list digest..." >> > -- >> > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> > >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> >> >> >> >> >> **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for >> fuel-efficient used cars. ( >> http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >> > >
- Previous message: Helicopter crashes
- Next message: FOLLOWUP - Cobra bite
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
