Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster"
Charles Brault c_brault at yahoo.comThu Jan 3 01:39:19 GMT 2008
- Previous message: British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster"
- Next message: British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Let's make sure I am well understood Considering an 8 min BLS response time 10 min scene time A BLS transport if NO ALS available A 5 min transport time to a level 1 Trauma center (let's make that 10 min) Ladi Di would have been in a trauma center On the 10th min as opposed to the 90th min of the Paris SAMU intervention I don't know But If something could have been done It would have been on the 10th minute And not the 90th min Charles ----- Original Message ---- From: caesar ursic <cmursic at gmail.com> To: "Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 9:25:48 PM Subject: Re: British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster" Dr. Mattox: Her injury may very well have been unsalvageable, given what is now known about the autopsy. And I agree that your original assertion was that she got the best care available at the time. But my point is simply this: that care was not, based on what is known about the sequence of events on that morning, appropriate or 'the best' given the prehospital literature as we know it and as was available then. Had she sustained, instead of a pericardial rupture, a torn vena cava, or a tension pneumothorax and a fractured pelvis, or a grade IV spleen fracture, she could have easily have been just as unstable, just as hypotensive, just as prone to pre-hospital cardiac arrest given the initial delays in moving her out. And stopping an ambulance on the streets, less than 1 km form a hospital with a surgical team standing by, because the patient is too unstable to move, must be recognized for what it is - an outdated, dangerous approach. In Paris, Houston, Shanghai, Melbourne, Buenos Aires or anywhere else that an organized prehospital system exists. On Dec 30, 2007 5:12 PM, <KMATTOX at aol.com> wrote: > THe comment (actually my comment) was that this patient received the > very > best that Paris had to offer at the time. (I stand by that specific > comment). At that time and even now, the Paris "EMS SYSTEM" strongly > believes > that their system of SAMU, manned by anesthesiologist trained in critical > care > and taking a patient to one of the rotating hospitals to receive > "emergencies, and being met by anesthesiologists in a "reanimation room", > not a shock > room, and not with a trauma team, is superior to systems in other cities > in > France, and other countries. The German system is different from the > British > system, which is different from the Riyadh system, which is different > from > the Baltimore system, which is different from the Albuquerque system, and > on > and on . > > What this patient received in Paris that night was as good as it could > have > been in Paris that night even if any one of us had been present in the > city. > Some would argue that the German or French SAMU pre-hospital systems > is > superior to our load and go system of Houston and other cities. We > should > argue that in the literature with data, and I think we can. > > Caesar in an earlier post stated that it would have taken an special > aleignment of stars to have resulted in a save. The first 10 minute > loss of pulse > was when the talking patient was moved from setting upright in the car, > to > forced to lie supine on a stretcher on the ground. 10 minutes of CPR, > position changes, fluids and epinephrine. Return of pulse and > attention turned > to other victims. > > Cardiac herniation and death is quite common; ask any medical examiner or > review the trauma pathology literature. I know of no reports of ANY > survivors who have had a prehospital cardiac cesation or loss of pulse, > who have had > an EC thoracotomy via a median sternotomy or anteriolateral thoracotomy. > NONE. ZILCH. I have looked and looked. I can find survivors who > have > had a right sided cardiac herniation which was picked up hours later in a > patient that never had any loss of pulse, who did survive. > > So, my comments still stand and I do believe I have been politically > correct. > > k > > > > **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- 'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster"
- Next message: British Surgeon: "Princess Diana might have survived if treated faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
