List Archives

Wed Feb 13 15:41:39 GMT 2008

I understand your concerns Karim, especially concerning one retrospective
military study, but a small note of caution when one speaks of "global
practice".

Many hospitals in the world (the majority?) do not have access to blood
components. For many of us, the standard is whole blood, as fresh as
possible, and usually donated by a family member. I understand that what is
under discussion is practice in the industrialised world -- and certain
capital cities of the Third World -- but would also mention that recent
"military studies" from Iraq and Afghanistan have also extolled the benefits
of fresh whole blood for shock.

One idea might be to start swinging the pendulum back a bit. I imagine there
is a whole cohort of senior, not to say elderly, surgeons on the list who
started their practice using whole blood, in glass bottles! (Wonderful piece
of equipment to have around for autotransfusion.)  Perhaps some basic
research in an antiquated pre-blood-component technique would be in order.
Our colleagues in the industrialised world would have to help us out,
however. Not a simple task to do much research in a bush hospital, although
the US military is trying with their forward surgical teams.

best regards,

-- 
chris giannou
senior surgeon
international committee of the red cross
Monemvasia Lakonia
23070 Greece

List Archives

For your convenience, find the Trauma List Archive Below

1:1 blood transfusions for shock