Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Operating Room Resuscitations
Matthew Reeds mgreeds at reeds.uk.comFri Feb 1 18:24:33 GMT 2008
- Previous message: AW: unsubscribe
- Next message: OR Resus - a great debate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The priorities for the trauma patient needing resuscitation and where they ought to be (depending upon their injury and condition) are entirely clear. I am realistic in the practicalities of what each hospital can achieve and I do not believe that anyone on this list is naïve enough to presume that we live in utopia with unlimited resources and that everything we want we actually get for our patients. However what is clear is that we should always be continually striving for what is best for the patient and how to improve their care yet further (after all, every single one of us can improve upon what we do currently and we should learn/develop new techniques and encounter new medical advances etc. which will actually benefit our patients.) We KNOW that trauma patients should NOT receive resuscitation in the A&E/ED but yes, frequently they do in some parts (and this is clearly due to the hospital system in place at that institution and/or due to the lack of resources available.) Nevertheless some hospitals however CLEARLY demonstrate that this IS possible. There are also instances where people chose not to go to theatre/OR as quickly as they could or go to that ITU/HDU bed as quickly as they could (ITU/HDU beds can frequently be rapidly created/vacated when needed.) We should all be aiming for that, no matter who we are, what speciality we are in or where we are working. I fully appreciate the comments made by some A&E/ED clinicians on this list regarding taking up the flack for the failures of other specialities and lack of resources and, yes, this is SOMETIMES true but NOT everywhere or on every occasion. Just because hospitals are not performing the best for their patient (perhaps due to the system setup and/or resources available) does that mean that we should not strive to change things in order to improve them? When penicillin was discovered it was a fantastic antibiotic that reduced mortality and morbidity considerably. Does that mean that we either didnt or shouldnt have discovered other drugs such as Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Gentamycin, Ciprofloxacin etc.? Times change and things need to change for the BETTER (yes sometimes they dont.) This is what we ALL should be doing no matter what speciality we are in. Marks comment regarding the young boy involved in an RTC is unsurprising; given an occurrence that happened in my hospitals resus room last night (another head injury who had been admitted to the department for 2½ hours before ANY surgeon was notified.) The referral was made when the 49 year old patient had deteriorated to a GCS of 3 with bilateral fixed blown pupils.) The referral was even then ONLY made because there was a disagreement over whether to intubate and transfer the patient to ITU or not and the A&E Consultant/ED Attending had done his bit in giving 4 units of gelofusine, inserting a guerdal airway and warming the patient up with the bair hugger and had at that point had enough and was going home for the day (i.e. leaving someone else to sort the problem out.) Quite what the logic behind the high volume fluid infusion, hyperthermia for the brain injury (not cooling) and how the guerdal was going to protect the patients airway was I do not know. What is clear is that this is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE and merely compounds peoples opinions of the role of A&Es/EDs in managing trauma when this sort of patient management is encountered day after day. The whole process of managing ANY trauma patient relies upon everyone fulfilling a vital role which ensures that they ONLY act in the PATIENTS best interests (and NOT their personal self-interests in undertaking an intervention because they enjoy performing it) and this highlights the problems which result caused by those who do not follow this overriding principle. Yes surgeons like to operation but it is useful to remember that:- Any surgeon can operate. A better surgeon knows when to operate. The best surgeon knows when NOT to operate. This can and SHOULD be applied to every speciality. I would not operate on a patient just because I could when I knowingly believe that to do so would NOT be in the patients best interests. Naturally if the patient needs an operation I would NEVER find a reason for not operating (unless there is a clearly an obvious reason for not doing so.) Matthew
- Previous message: AW: unsubscribe
- Next message: OR Resus - a great debate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
