Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Interhospital Quality Improvement and HIPAA
Bjorn, Pret pbjorn at emh.orgWed Sep 5 14:23:11 BST 2007
- Previous message: Interhospital Quality Improvement and HIPAA
- Next message: Interhospital Quality Improvement and HIPAA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike, You're making it too complicated, and I'm not helping. Let's start over: As a direct healthcare provider, you have special access to information about your patient which is inherently and absolutely private. The only reasons to discuss or divulge ANY aspect of a patient's medical history or treatment are 1) for the purposes of direct care; or 2) as part of a structured and systematically protected performance improvement process; or 3) under subpoena. For all other circumstances, your extracurricular thoughts and actions should leave the impression that you have never met the guy. Period. It's no less a part of your job than securing the airway or giving the right dose of antibiotic. If the local paper or CNN or the Drudge Report features your patient, you have no control except to not participate. Whatever knowledge you've gained from the patient/provider relationship STILL BELONGS TO THE PATIENT, and is not yours to share, even as a function of merely concurring with other published reports. Protected health information is pretty freaking global in scope, including such rudimentary details as whether someone is hospitalized: even if Katie Couric says Joe Smith is a patient at your hospital, you need Joe's permission to confirm or deny it. No exceptions. That's what your Community Relations department is for. If you want to discuss a particular patient's splenectomy on the Trauma-List, or at a conference, or a Super Bowl party, your options are predictably restricted: you can obtain written informed consent, or you can harmlessly alter the details so that the patient's identity is hidden and irrelevant -- that is, you can turn it into a hypothetical. In every imaginable way, the patient's identity is unimportant anyhow; else, you're gossiping. So (in the previous email) the backhoe becomes a forklift. The teenager is now 35. Voila, you can discuss the amputation now. How tough was that? Pret -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Interhospital Quality Improvement and HIPAA
- Next message: Interhospital Quality Improvement and HIPAA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
