Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Ideal length of stay in the ED
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgMon Oct 15 17:53:25 BST 2007
- Previous message: Ideal length of stay in the ED
- Next message: Ideal length of stay in the ED
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If the hospital administrators did the math, I would bet that eventually they will realize that they could hire 3 or 4 full-time hospital based surgeons, pay them a really nice salary, watch them bring in enough revenue to be profitable, and they wouldn't have to shell out $365,000 to bribe them to take call. We have entered a new low in medicine. While I do understand that there have been, are, and will continue to be enormous forces that have helped to drive our moral and ethical slide, the bottom line is simple - no one can FORCE any of us to do what we all know is morally and ethically wrong. If we knowingly do something wrong, it was our choice, and our choice alone. I'll shut up now. Ron >>> "Moore, Rick" <Rick.Moore at TriadHospitals.com> 10/15/2007 12:36 PM >>> I don't deny that call is hell, in or out of house. I myself pull 60 hours of call every third weekend as the on-call ED Supervisor and many times that means working at least a 12 hour shift once I have been called. When we designated as a level III center, we had to put a general surgery back up call schedule in place in order to receive our designation. Since we had to do it the surgeons of course held out for call pay an knew they would get it. Now a surgeon makes $1000. a day just to carry a beeper and stay within a 30 minute response radius to the hospital. Our volume is still somewhat low and the back-up gets activated an average of once a month. REM -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Smith Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:23 AM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Ideal length of stay in the ED Well Ron is in the midst of a stretch of every other night in house on call and stays till at least 5 the next day. You couldn't pay me enough for that. The Chair of Trauma at Cook County, the young and beautiful Dr. Roberts, will be taking two such calls in the next 7 days for free. But yeah, it should include that. Rob Smith -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Moore, Rick Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 12:14 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: Ideal length of stay in the ED Wouldn't acting "in the patient's best interest" include having surgeons that take trauma call without insisting on exorbitant amounts of call pay or shipping the uninsured or under insured? REM -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Ronald Gross Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:04 AM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Ideal length of stay in the ED Another novel concept - acting "in the patient's best interest". Rob, I think that you and I just might be on to something wonderful! LOL Ron >>> "Robert F. Smith" <rfsmithmd at comcast.net> 10/15/2007 12:01 PM >>> IMHO it is essential that ED physicians have admitting privileges. Otherwise their job is impossible and the ED is a total dumping ground and they ED docs become slaves to all the other in house services. Of course people will object strenuously to this but if people can't act like adults in the patient's best interest this becomes a viable solution. Rob -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Krin135 at aol.com Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:52 AM To: trauma-list at trauma.org Cc: KMATTOX at aol.com Subject: Re: Ideal length of stay in the ED In a message dated 14-Oct-07 10:35:16 Central Daylight Time, KMATTOX at aol.com writes: In a message dated 10/14/2007 9:57:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time, andrewj.bowman at gmail.com writes: What then do we do about the attendings (fill in specialty here) who are reluctant to admit a patient without the complete workup???? Create a hospital policy that allows, encourages, mandates that the EC staff have the authority, and supported by the Medical Executive Committee to admit a patient to any hospital in-service where the service is slow to evaluate the patient or require that an entire work up occur there prior to going to an in house bed. k I'd love it...now just need to convince the med exec committee (and the hospitalists) that the hospitalists and attendings don't need every jot and tittle done in the ED prior to admission.... and convince some of the residents at major teaching hospitals that they can finish the work up faster after they have the patient in their hands than the smaller hospitals can do prior to transfer... ck Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Ideal length of stay in the ED
- Next message: Ideal length of stay in the ED
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
