Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgSat Oct 13 20:34:26 BST 2007
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Most posters on this subject have agreed that the protracted LONG times that people stay in the EC when it is obvious that they cannot go home is excessive" Another way of saying this is "When the ortho and trauma and neuro and medicine hospitalists are refusing to admit the patient and pointing to the other guy aas the admitting service". Ron >>> <KMATTOX at aol.com> 10/13/2007 1:18 PM >>> In a message dated 10/13/2007 12:11:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Rgross at harthosp.org writes: Ken, I am going to have to disagree here, and may God have mercy!! ;-) The FAST will tell you whether the unstable patient with a pelvic fracture needs angio or needs to go directly to the OR. As I see it, bad fracture with negative FAST needs angio; unstable patient with bad fracture and POSITIVE FAST needs OR, ex-lap, packing and then angio I have NO problem in staying in the EC long enough to make a decision as to just where to go. No problem. Most posters on this subject have agreed that the protracted LONG times that people stay in the EC when it is obvious that they cannot go home is excessive. k ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
