Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgSat Oct 13 18:10:47 BST 2007
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ken, I am going to have to disagree here, and may God have mercy!! ;-) The FAST will tell you whether the unstable patient with a pelvic fracture needs angio or needs to go directly to the OR. As I see it, bad fracture with negative FAST needs angio; unstable patient with bad fracture and POSITIVE FAST needs OR, ex-lap, packing and then angio. I am still waiting for the surgical community to fully embrace the extraperitoneal packing before I abandon - or at least temper my use of - angiography. Ron >>> <KMATTOX at aol.com> 10/13/2007 12:48 PM >>> For an emergency room to keep ANY patient who obviously requires admission, is not the best use of the resources in that location, whether it be a critical trauma patient, a heart attack, or a pneumonia. If it is obvious as to where the patient should go (trauma goes to a surgical service, either OR, floor, or ICU), then that patient can get the FAST, etc, at that secondary location and aid in the overcrowding of the EC. k ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
