Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgSat Oct 13 18:05:17 BST 2007
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roy, FAST is indeed the standard of care. And the reason it is fast is 'cause in experienced hands it can be done in under 2 minutes - and most often under ONE! Where does it fit? You should be able to get it done while one nurse is starting IV's (IF needed), the other is drawing blood, the x-ray tech is positioning the plate, and the tech is starting the foley. Now, if you really want to light a fire, the FAST could be done while the chest and pelvic films are being done, and all the rest can be done IN THE OR! There are your 5-8 minutes, with one or 2 to spare! :-) Just my 2 cents. Ron >>> Roy Danks <roydanks at hotmail.com> 10/13/2007 12:41 PM >>> I never thought of that, but then again, at our center, the ED physicians are not involved with trauma patients (who meet activation criteria) at all. The rare, VERY RARE, exception would be if the surgeon on-call were to take one to the OR and another hit the door before the back up surgeon could arrive. Happens, but not often. If we go back to the original post, to re-direct, the question as one of "how long should a seriously injured trauma patient be in the trauma bay" (paraphased, but accurate). "serious" may be user-defined inasmuch as there are different levels, of course. Dr. Mattox has yet to present literature of evidence to support his 3-8 min time frame. I respect the hell out of the man for his experience, candor and advancement of trauma surgery as we know it today. But he wants evidence that backs CTA for aortic injuries...I want the same for time in the trauma bay. Yes, there are ridiculously long stays that are unwarranted and dangerous. But there are short stays that may be equally unwarranted and dangerous. I submit this question to the list: Is FAST considered a "standard of care" diagnostic tool in the level I trauma center...whether interpreted by the surgeon, surgery resident, radiologist/resident? If you aren't doing it, are you practicing beneath the standard? And, back to Dr. Mattox's response, how do you fit it into an 8 min trauma with ABC's, chest tubes, etc? RRD _________________________________________________________________ Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today. http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline-- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Ideal ED length of stay? (information & communications support)
- Next message: Ideal ED length of stay?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
