ideal ER lengths of stay?

• Previous message: ideal ER lengths of stay?
• Next message: Longer EC STAY
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

3-8 min in ED seems quite impossible,if nothing,then here at least where l
live
but the real question l'm asking how many patients would actually benefit
from almost direct referral to OR instead of preparing them in ED? what are
the risks of not having primary and 2ndry survey in ER,along with quick labs
which inform us with essential information? how thorough and equipped  OR
staff is in rapid evaluation of patients status praesens with basic
knowledge of function of vital organs?do they perform CBC,U/A,U&E,how easy
is US approach,due to need for preparation of surgical field? X-rays? amount
of docs and nurses to do all of these things rapidly, l would say,in 15-20
min?
another thing, l know that subject has been discussed, ER thoracotomies and
even expl larapotomies(need to clamp aorta)?
Ante

2007/10/12, KMATTOX at aol.com <KMATTOX at aol.com>:
>
>
> In a message dated 10/11/2007 11:29:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> andrewj.bowman at gmail.com writes:
>
> Did your  EMS have a pre-paralyzed GCS?
>
>
> NOPE,   It was NOT my  EMS.   It was an EMS at the  perpiphery of Houston
> and
> outside the Houston Fire Department  supervision.     We have not been
> able
> to have any education  impact on two of the more than 30 ambulances
> services
> outside  Houston.   Houston EMS is very very good and very very quality
> controled.
>
> In my opinion RSI does more harm than good.
>
> k
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new at
> http://www.aol.com
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
>

• Previous message: ideal ER lengths of stay?
• Next message: Longer EC STAY
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]