Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Cut vs uncut tubes
Ian Seppelt SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.auThu Oct 4 23:52:53 BST 2007
- Previous message: Morning quickie
- Next message: Cut vs uncut tubes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I suggest that Nick's case reveals inadequacies in the interhospital transport process. Who was the attendant? Anaesthetic or ICU registrar who should have known better? Junior doctor with no idea? Skilled paramedic with intubation skills (who again should have known better)? Or non-paramedic, who again would not be expected to have any idea. In the context of a prehospital paramedic system and a good interhospital retrieval system [which is the envionment I work in], I maintain there is no place for cut tubes and a lot of potential problems with tubes that are too short. The only purpose for a cut tube is to prevent (inadequately trained) people pushing it in to far [and that applies equally to doctors, nurses and ambos]. Cheers, Ian >>> nick at macartney.org 5/10/2007 3:06am >>> While I agree to some extent with Ian, having been on the receiving end of a patient transferred from an icu with a tube in the right lower lobe bronchus - yes, not the right main bronchus, beware the law of unexpected consequences. A change made for an apparently good reason, might cause another problem.... There is not the correct length of tube, and IMHO no formula will get it right at all times. Training is the key, but even then... After all, my patient was transferred from one hospital to another. Nick Macartney -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Ian Seppelt Sent: 02 October 2007 06:24 To: atacc.doc at btinternet.com; Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Cut vs uncut tubes I'll disagree with Mark's last sentence. Pprovided the personnel are appropriately trained there is NO problem with uncut tubes! Having been on the receiving end of cut tubes in rapidly swelling burnt patients I can tell you it is no fun at all having to change these tubes. The NSW Ambulance Service has only carried cut tubes from the beginning of the paramedic service in 1976, but is about to (thankfully) abandon that and only use uncut tubes. The risks of inserting a tube that is too short, and subsequently needs to be changed [and we see this at least once a month], is much greater than the risk of an endobronchial tube, in the hands of a trained operator. Cheers, Ian Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM Senior Staff Specialist Dept of Intensive Care Medicine The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Director of Clinical Research, Sydney West AHS Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney >>> atacc.doc at btinternet.com 21/09/2007 2:53am >>> HI Tug, Although a longer tube and your catheter mount will increase the dead space, in adults this volume will have little effect as compared to the overall tidal volume of 6-7ml/|Kg. Children are a very different affair and ideally with small children and babies (<25Kg and below to pick a number!) your breathing system should connect directly to the tube, as even 10-15mls could be significant. Uncut ET tubes are always a controversial area. In major facial trauma, burns or other conditions producing major swelling then they are appropriate, but in most other circumstances they can produce problems with endobronchial postioning, migration and kinking. Mark F UK ----- Original Message ---- From: "tuganddawn at talktalk.net" <tuganddawn at talktalk.net> To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Thursday, 20 September, 2007 12:45:54 PM Subject: Dead space Hello everyone, I recently had a conversation with a Paramedic colleage who suggested that if you intubate a patient (prehospital) with an uncut ETT you should not use a cobb connector (the corrugated plastic tubing betweeen BVM and tube) because of the excessive dead space created. Though I appreciate that we are using manual ventillation I disagreed with this in adult patients due to the relatively small size of these connectors. I appreciate that this is an extremely basic question but I am curious to see what the consensus is. Thanks for your time and patience ladies and gents and look forward to your responses. Take care and Kindest Regards FF Tug Crumpton SR para -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 23/09/2007 13:53 -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Morning quickie
- Next message: Cut vs uncut tubes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
