Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Cut vs uncut tubes
Ian Seppelt SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.auTue Oct 2 06:24:14 BST 2007
- Next message: Cut vs uncut tubes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'll disagree with Mark's last sentence. Pprovided the personnel are appropriately trained there is NO problem with uncut tubes! Having been on the receiving end of cut tubes in rapidly swelling burnt patients I can tell you it is no fun at all having to change these tubes. The NSW Ambulance Service has only carried cut tubes from the beginning of the paramedic service in 1976, but is about to (thankfully) abandon that and only use uncut tubes. The risks of inserting a tube that is too short, and subsequently needs to be changed [and we see this at least once a month], is much greater than the risk of an endobronchial tube, in the hands of a trained operator. Cheers, Ian Ian Seppelt FANZCA FJFICM Senior Staff Specialist Dept of Intensive Care Medicine The Nepean Hospital, PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Director of Clinical Research, Sydney West AHS Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney >>> atacc.doc at btinternet.com 21/09/2007 2:53am >>> HI Tug, Although a longer tube and your catheter mount will increase the dead space, in adults this volume will have little effect as compared to the overall tidal volume of 6-7ml/|Kg. Children are a very different affair and ideally with small children and babies (<25Kg and below to pick a number!) your breathing system should connect directly to the tube, as even 10-15mls could be significant. Uncut ET tubes are always a controversial area. In major facial trauma, burns or other conditions producing major swelling then they are appropriate, but in most other circumstances they can produce problems with endobronchial postioning, migration and kinking. Mark F UK ----- Original Message ---- From: "tuganddawn at talktalk.net" <tuganddawn at talktalk.net> To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Thursday, 20 September, 2007 12:45:54 PM Subject: Dead space Hello everyone, I recently had a conversation with a Paramedic colleage who suggested that if you intubate a patient (prehospital) with an uncut ETT you should not use a cobb connector (the corrugated plastic tubing betweeen BVM and tube) because of the excessive dead space created. Though I appreciate that we are using manual ventillation I disagreed with this in adult patients due to the relatively small size of these connectors. I appreciate that this is an extremely basic question but I am curious to see what the consensus is. Thanks for your time and patience ladies and gents and look forward to your responses. Take care and Kindest Regards FF Tug Crumpton SR para -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Next message: Cut vs uncut tubes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
