Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Army Trauma Medidine: NY Times
Ronald Gross Rgross at harthosp.orgThu Nov 8 17:52:53 GMT 2007
- Previous message: Army Trauma Medidine: NY Times
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 52, Issue 32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Holcomb has moved resuscitation - hemostatic resuscitation - to a new level, and I have to wonder what it is about that that Dr. Shorr has an issue with. Overly aggressive? Give me a damn break! If I am not mistaken, they called Marconi and Edison nuts. And I believe that Frank Spencer was damn near court martialled for not following Army doctrine and amputating limbs, but rather performing arterial repains and bypass grafts. I am sorry to say this, but as I see it, Dr. Shorr needs to disclose what his real agenda is. What has Dr. Shorr done lately that he can hang his hat on? His quoted comments about Factor VIIa could certainly be argued with. I can't seem to recall any significant contribution that Dr. Shorr has made to the troops who are bleeding and dying, to Army medicine, or, for that matter to civilian medicine, and I have been on both sides of the aisle for many years. Sounds like he is just a bit jealous that someone has made an impact in an area that he hadn't thought to look. Just MHO, for what that is worth. Ron >>> "Robert F. Smith" <rfsmithmd at comcast.net> 11/7/2007 1:47 PM >>> If the NYTimes is like other newspapers, the guy who writes the story doesn’t write the headline, which I thought was the negative sounding part. I thought the article made it sound like Dr. Holcomb had accomplished a lot of important and positive changes in the Army's Trauma System. He seemed very focused and dedicated and I thought he repeatedly made the point that it was imperative that the knowledge gained from this terrible experience be used to improve trauma care for soldiers and civilians alike. I also thought he sounded pretty forthcoming about the trials, the lack of strongly positive data and his rationale for going ahead anyway. Artificial blood has been a very difficult "Holy Grail" for a long time. Lots of previously promising products have not panned out. To say the least. Rob Smith -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Roy Danks Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:26 PM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: Army Trauma Medidine: NY Times This blog will likely generate a huge response, so clear your inbox out! I'm a huge proponent of Col Holcomb's. I've met the man and talked to him. He is the consummate gentleman and a scholar among scholars. What is conspicuously missing from the NY Times article is the fact, undisputable in my mind, that war, as horrible as it is, helps trauma surgery/care make strides of nearly exponential gain. All wars have done this. Look in the first chpt of Mattox's book...much is about the advances of trauma surgery as it pertains to war. What Col Holcomb is doing in the war (not alone, of course) is making the necessary adjustments in the midst of very trying and difficult circumstances, with injuries that most of us outside of the armed forces will see only a smattering of in our career. Sounds to me like Dr. Shorr may have an axe to grind. If you've not read Mash, an Army Surgeon in Korea, Otto F. Apel, I strongly recommend it. His early work on arterial "transplants" is in the book. Not entirely ethical by today's standards, but certainly was a major advancement. This war is going to take hits from all angles. I'll leave my 2 cents out. But I support what the military surgeons, nurses, medics, etc are doing over there 110%. The NY Times will slant anything they can away from the positive if it advances their agenda. RRD _________________________________________________________________ Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct-- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community / -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Army Trauma Medidine: NY Times
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 52, Issue 32
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
