Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
trauma-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 26
mls at webmail.co.za mls at webmail.co.zaTue May 22 17:49:18 BST 2007
- Previous message: [ccm-l] "Sicko" premise
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 26
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Do you think it possible to get these (fluid warmers) in all the ESV (emergency service vehicle)? If hypothermia can be prevented by having them, why not have them. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Level I Fluid Warmer (Ronald Gross) > 2. RE: Level I Fluid Warmer (trauma at emergencyunit.com) > 3. Re: Level 1 Fluid Infusor (KMATTOX at aol.com) > 4. Level I Fluid Warmer (bensonblues at comcast.net) > 5. RE: Level I Fluid Warmer (Hardcastle, Tim, Dr <tch at sun.ac.za>) > 6. Re: Herniaion of Lung (Ronald Gross) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:47:15 -0400 > From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org> > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> > Message-ID: <464D9243.7FF1.00B9.0 at harthosp.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Truth be told, not only have both modes of therapy (high volume infusion > and permissive hypotension) been questioned, but depending on who you > read, they have actually been felt to be detrimental to the patient. > Hmmmmm........................ > >>>> MARK FORREST <atacc.doc at btinternet.com> 5/17/2007 2:15 PM >>> > Ron....remember that high volume crystalloid is still not scientifically > proven either!!!! > Mark F > UK > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ronald Gross <Rgross at harthosp.org> > To: trauma-list at trauma.org > Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 2:38:00 PM > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > Larry, > Remember that talk is cheap - and with "all the talk of permissive > hypotention" that practice is still not universally accepted nor > scientifically proven......(sorry, Ken). > Ron > >>>> <ofiara at comcast.net> 5/16/2007 12:22 PM >>> > Yes, a Level One Fluid warmer or any type of fluid warmer has it's place. > The question is, does a RAPID INFUSER have a place in the trauma setting. > With all the talk of permiisve hypotention, I see a limited use in the > E.D. > Larry Ofiara, RN. > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Connie Potter" <Connie at traumafoundation.org> > >> >> Although a Level I may be a coat rack in temperate climates, in icy cold >> rural OR they saved more than one patient's bacon. The ED, OR had the >> same equipment saving time to transfer the patient and administer >> PRBC's, the tubing snaps in quite easily (compared to some of the old >> warmers), and little training was required to get them in use. >> Remember, other parts of the US have what is called WINTER! >> >> Connie Potter, >> >> >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > Confidentiality Notice > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary > information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > Confidentiality Notice > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary > information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:03:36 +0100 > From: <trauma at emergencyunit.com> > Subject: RE: Level I Fluid Warmer > To: "'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list'" > <trauma-list at trauma.org> > Message-ID: <003c01c79976$dbe18890$0301a8c0 at vaio> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > What nonsense. It is impossible to get control of many types of pelvis > fracture (such as the vertical shear) and so you have to give fluid to > these > patients or they exsanguinate into the pelvis. Remember - it's a bucket, > and > the bigger the bucket the more it holds. The problem comes when the > patient > gets given the wrong fluid. What the trauma patient needs is blood. What > most get is erythrocytes suspended in clotting-agent free mannitol > solution. > If we give our patients proper fresh blood - mirabile dictu, clot forms. > And > keeps forming. We have let the haematologists persuade us that they can > take > everything useful out of a bag of blood and we can give it as though it is > blood. > > And we keep giving the rubbish. Surprise, surprise, 4 units later there is > ooze everywhere, and 2 days later a dead patient. > > BFM. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] > On Behalf Of Aruni Sen > Sent: 18 May 2007 11:43 > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: RE: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > Volume is serious bad news in pelvis because the bleeding needs longer > time > to clot. > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] > On Behalf Of MARK FORREST > Sent: 17 May 2007 19:15 > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > > Ron....remember that high volume crystalloid is still not scientifically > proven either!!!! Mark F UK > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ronald Gross <Rgross at harthosp.org> > To: trauma-list at trauma.org > Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 2:38:00 PM > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > Larry, > Remember that talk is cheap - and with "all the talk of permissive > hypotention" that practice is still not universally accepted nor > scientifically proven......(sorry, Ken). Ron > >>>> <ofiara at comcast.net> 5/16/2007 12:22 PM >>> > Yes, a Level One Fluid warmer or any type of fluid warmer has it's place. > The question is, does a RAPID INFUSER have a place in the trauma setting. > With all the talk of permiisve hypotention, I see a limited use in the > E.D. > Larry Ofiara, RN. > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Connie Potter" <Connie at traumafoundation.org> > >> >> Although a Level I may be a coat rack in temperate climates, in icy > cold >> rural OR they saved more than one patient's bacon. The ED, OR had the >> same equipment saving time to transfer the patient and administer >> PRBC's, the tubing snaps in quite easily (compared to some of the old >> warmers), and little training was required to get them in use. >> Remember, other parts of the US have what is called WINTER! >> >> Connie Potter, >> >> >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > Confidentiality Notice > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary > information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Links to North East Wales NHS Trust email disclaimers. > > Cymraeg www.newalesnhstrust.org.uk/index.php?page=aildisclaimer&lang= > > English www.newalesnhstrust.org.uk/index.php?page=aildisclaimer&lang= > _________________________________________________________________ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:03:40 EDT > From: KMATTOX at aol.com > Subject: Re: Level 1 Fluid Infusor > To: trauma-list at trauma.org, cmursic at gmail.com > Message-ID: <d6a.692c452.337f447c at aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > In a message dated 5/17/2007 11:08:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > SeppelI at wahs.nsw.gov.au writes: > > Thanks, Ken - just the picture I was looking for. Are you happy if I > show it in a public presentation (with due credit)? > Thanks, Ian > > > You or anyone on this list can show it anywhere anytime > > k > > > > ************************************** See what's free at > http://www.aol.com. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:58:29 +0000 > From: bensonblues at comcast.net > Subject: Level I Fluid Warmer > To: trauma-list at trauma.org > Message-ID: > <051820072258.15533.464E2F95000862B300003CAD22165514069C0A9A040D02019C020A0D at comcast.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain > > High volume infusion, permissive hypotension, ad nauseum: It all depends. > Dogma is something that the internists can get away with, but not those of > us who take care of the injured. Give me a pt with a GSW to the groin and > on-scene exsanguination, hemostasis achieved with direct pressure, but > without a blood pressure, the early experiments by Arthur Guyton on > hemorrhage still prevail: Aggressive volume resuscitation is more likely > than not to decrease morbidity and mortality. However, give me a pt struck > by an auto with multiple injuries, uncontrolled intracavitary hemorrhage, > and no blood pressure, and with the exception of high volume transfusion > of fresh whole blood (when was the last time you administered that?), high > volume resuscitation is likely to contribute to hemodilution and > coagulopathy and continued and worsening hemorrhage. I'm under the firm > belief that it doesn't really matter what you do preoperatively (with few > exceptions). The most important determinant of > surviv > al from trauma is 1) the time it takes to get the patient to the OR and 2) > the skills of the surgeon. I hope that this statement is without > controversy. Every trauma victim is a little different from the next, and > judgement should prevail. No matter what your management strategy, it > always depends on the patient injuries, pre-existing medical problems, > medications the patient is taking, and your available resources. In short, > there is a role for the high-volume infuser in selected cases. It's > utility would be greatly increased if fresh whole blood were to be used. > > DB > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 06:45:46 +0200 > From: "Hardcastle, Tim, Dr <tch at sun.ac.za>" <tch at sun.ac.za> > Subject: RE: Level I Fluid Warmer > To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> > Message-ID: > <3FE6F2A76FE75C418D3E0481CD75EA1E329066 at TYGEVS01.tyg.sun.ac.za> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > BFM > > That is why the consensus is now that blood-products should not be used in > isolation. The recommended ratio is 1:1:1,i.e. 1PRBC, 1FFP and 1 platelet > consentrate particularly where the transfusion load will exceed 6 PRBC. > (See the J Trauma Suppl 2006 (May or June) and the ISBT-Science Series vol > 1(1) from 2006 - their new conference consensus series issue) > > PRBC alone should not be used in trauma. > > Tim > Dr T C Hardcastle > M.B.,Ch.B.(Stell); M.Med(Chir); FCS(SA) > Senior Surgeon / Senior Lecturer: Surgery (Trauma and ICU) > ATLS instructor and DSTC Cape Town Course Director > Intern program Coordinator: Surgery > M.Med (Emergency Medicine) Executive Committee member > Clinical Head (Director): Diana Princess of Wales Trauma Unit > Division of Surgery (General) Room 4064 > Department of Surgical Sciences > Tygerberg Hospital / University of Stellenbosch > PO Box 19063 > Tygerberg 7505 > Western Cape > South Africa > e-mail: tch at sun.ac.za > Cell: +27824681615 > Office: +27219389281 or 4911 pager 0302 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]On Behalf Of > trauma at emergencyunit.com > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:04 PM > To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' > Subject: RE: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > What nonsense. It is impossible to get control of many types of pelvis > fracture (such as the vertical shear) and so you have to give fluid to > these > patients or they exsanguinate into the pelvis. Remember - it's a bucket, > and > the bigger the bucket the more it holds. The problem comes when the > patient > gets given the wrong fluid. What the trauma patient needs is blood. What > most get is erythrocytes suspended in clotting-agent free mannitol > solution. > If we give our patients proper fresh blood - mirabile dictu, clot forms. > And > keeps forming. We have let the haematologists persuade us that they can > take > everything useful out of a bag of blood and we can give it as though it is > blood. > > And we keep giving the rubbish. Surprise, surprise, 4 units later there is > ooze everywhere, and 2 days later a dead patient. > > BFM. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] > On Behalf Of Aruni Sen > Sent: 18 May 2007 11:43 > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: RE: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > Volume is serious bad news in pelvis because the bleeding needs longer > time > to clot. > > -----Original Message----- > From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org > [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] > On Behalf Of MARK FORREST > Sent: 17 May 2007 19:15 > To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > > Ron....remember that high volume crystalloid is still not scientifically > proven either!!!! Mark F UK > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ronald Gross <Rgross at harthosp.org> > To: trauma-list at trauma.org > Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 2:38:00 PM > Subject: Re: Level I Fluid Warmer > > > Larry, > Remember that talk is cheap - and with "all the talk of permissive > hypotention" that practice is still not universally accepted nor > scientifically proven......(sorry, Ken). Ron > >>>> <ofiara at comcast.net> 5/16/2007 12:22 PM >>> > Yes, a Level One Fluid warmer or any type of fluid warmer has it's place. > The question is, does a RAPID INFUSER have a place in the trauma setting. > With all the talk of permiisve hypotention, I see a limited use in the > E.D. > Larry Ofiara, RN. > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Connie Potter" <Connie at traumafoundation.org> > >> >> Although a Level I may be a coat rack in temperate climates, in icy > cold >> rural OR they saved more than one patient's bacon. The ED, OR had the >> same equipment saving time to transfer the patient and administer >> PRBC's, the tubing snaps in quite easily (compared to some of the old >> warmers), and little training was required to get them in use. >> Remember, other parts of the US have what is called WINTER! >> >> Connie Potter, >> >> >> -- >> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG >> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: >> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > Confidentiality Notice > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary > information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Links to North East Wales NHS Trust email disclaimers. > > Cymraeg www.newalesnhstrust.org.uk/index.php?page=aildisclaimer&lang= > > English www.newalesnhstrust.org.uk/index.php?page=aildisclaimer&lang= > _________________________________________________________________ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:09:53 -0400 > From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org> > Subject: Re: Herniaion of Lung > To: <trauma-list at trauma.org> > Message-ID: <464C1BDF.7FF1.00B9.0 at harthosp.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Gross, R.I; Eversgerd, J.L.. Transthoracic Lung Herniation Due to Blunt > Trauma. > J Trauma, May 2006; 60:1149. > > >>>> rm khattar <dr_rm_khattar at yahoo.co.in> 5/17/2007 8:01 AM >>> > How to diagnose Herniation Of Lung clinically and > radiologically?What is the differential diagnosis?How > to treat it? > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new > http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > Confidentiality Notice > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary > information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: Figure 2A.jpg > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 30839 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://list.mistral.net/pipermail/trauma-list/attachments/20070517/c915dfce/Figure2A.jpg > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: Figure 1.JPG > Type: image/jpeg > Size: 772830 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://list.mistral.net/pipermail/trauma-list/attachments/20070517/c915dfce/Figure1.jpg > > ------------------------------ > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ > > End of trauma-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 26 > ******************************************* > ------------------------------------------- South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za ------------------------------------------------------------------ For super low premiums, click here http://www.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
- Previous message: [ccm-l] "Sicko" premise
- Next message: trauma-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 26
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
