Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
stabbed heart
caesar ursic cmursic at gmail.comWed May 2 04:51:09 BST 2007
- Previous message: stabbed heart
- Next message: stabbed heart
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OK, thanks to all who have responded. There are clearly several different opinions to this 'not uncommon' scenario. I'll tell you what was done. I wasn't there, but as the trauma director I am "QAing" (quality assurance) or "PIing" (performance improvement) this case (choose your favorite acronym). I present this case because I truly value your opinions (although I secretly hope that they support my own biases). To re-cap: 16 year old kid, single stab-wound to precordium, clearly in advanced state of shock on arrival, intubated rapidly, equal bilateral breath sounds, no other signs of injury except laceration located just to left of xyphoid, FAST clearly shows pericardial effusion. So....after intubation, bilateral chest tubes were placed. This did notimprove the situation. No blood evacuated through the tubes, no 'rush of air' heard (but the room was loud). The surgeon then opened the chest via left anterolateral approach through fourth interpsace. No blood in left thoracic cavity, but tense pericardium noted. This was opened in the standard fashion releasing a large, congealed clot. A three cm laceration over the left ventricle was noted, bleeding freely. The surgeon then inserted a Foley catheter into the heart through the stab wound, inflated the balloon, and stopped the bleeding. The injury was then repaired around the Foley catheter using 2-0 prolene sutures on teflon pledgets. The Foley balloon was deflated and and removed, with a final 2-0 prolene suture placed where the catheter had exited. Good cardiac hemostasis. Patient then taken to OR where the left chest was fully explored and peripheral hemostasis was achieved, fresh chest tubes were placed, and the chest was closed. Patient extubated about 18 hours later. No obvious neurologic deficits, but he will undergo formal cognitive testing prior to discharge. Questions for the list members: 1. Were the bilateral chest tubes indicated? Remember, there was FAST evidence of cardiac tamponade shortly after arrival, and the breath sounds were 'equal.' Placing chest tubes did delay the thoracotomy (not by much, but there was a delay), since the surgeon was one of two individuals inserting them (an ER doc placed the other tube). Should a patient with fading or absent pulses presenting with a suspected cardiac injury (based on wound location and clinical or ultrasonographic signs of cardiac tamponade) ever get chest tubes first, or is the resuscitative thoracotomy the first step? Seems to me you can rapidly decompress the left chest and evaluate the heart with one swift stroke of the scalpel rather than spend time inserting a chest tube that will do nothing for a heart injury, if present. If the left chest and heart seem normal, the thoracotomy can rapidly be extended into the right chest to determine if there is any problem there. 2. Is there any role for the Foley catheter in controlling simple, linear stab wounds to the heart? Granted, it is a sexy and cool approach, but does it really accomplish anything that a gently but firmly placed finger or two over the wound doesn't accomplish? I'm referring to good 'ole direct digital pressure. Foley catheters in the heart have been blamed for making the hole in the heart larger (with every beat of the heart) and of making the eventual repair more difficult, etc. I've done it myself once. There is even one study (in pigs) that demonstrated a reduction in cardiac output due to the inflated intra-cardiac Foley balloon. And then there is the small but real risk of introducing air into the cardiac chamber, which is not always a good thing. 3. Should one strive to repair the heart laceration in the ED during the resuscitative thoracotomy or take the patient to the OR (with the finger on the wound to control hemorrhage) where lights and instruments and suction are (usually) better? Assuming, of course, that an OR is readily available. Thank you all of your comments. CMU
- Previous message: stabbed heart
- Next message: stabbed heart
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
