Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices
Bjorn, Pret pbjorn at emh.orgWed Mar 28 13:10:00 BST 2007
- Previous message: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices
- Next message: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
A logical approach; but ours is a voluntary system, more carrot than stick. I think that there would be a reluctance for hospitals to ratify any global policy; and enforcement, should it become necessary, would be difficult. We have three regional trauma centers doing good work (one ACS Level I and two Level II's). Busting any of the three over something like this might do more harm than good. All that on the table, I nonetheless see what you're after (I think): if we can "blame the system" for families' lack of a vote, then we'd have more consistent and thorough PI on a handful of cases. But even if that were acceptable, a little scripting might avoid the predictable withdrawal into a "it's the state's fault, not ours" culture. Pret -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Smith Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:10 AM To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices Is your hospital part of any trauma system? Could they "require" it? -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn, Pret Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:01 AM To: Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices Maine is a state like many in the U.S. WITHOUT mandatory autopsy for trauma deaths -- there simply isn't the money for it. As such, deaths are referred to local Medical Examiners (mostly general medicine folk), who have a look at the record and the corpse and determine whether a necropsy would help -- for lack of another motivation -- to determine foul play. In short, if you can make it look like accidental blunt-force injury, you can probably get away with murder around here. My hospital provides autopsy (gross post mortem only) for trauma deaths where the cause is unknown, or when performance issues are in play. Problem is, these are voluntary and subject to consent of the family. Getting consent is a neat trick, though. I wonder if anyone out there is in the same boat, and suffers varying responses from loved ones to the option of autopsy. Specifically, I'd be very grateful for any advice on how to present the issue to families in the most productive manner possible. Is there any winning script, or are there key phrases that maybe we haven't thought of? I think our surgeons are very sensitive and encouraging, and quick to point out that the service is underwritten by the hospital (should be obvious to families, but isn't); but there's a predictable visceral reaction to the request that we haven't been able to overcome. Thanks for your thoughts and advice. Pret Bjorn, RN Bangor, ME USA -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices
- Next message: Autopsy Requests: Scripting & Best Practices
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
