Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
To catheterise or not to catheterise...
Mathias Kalkum listen at doc-kalkum.deThu Mar 22 17:33:02 GMT 2007
- Previous message: To catheterise or not to catheterise...
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ross, > - snip - hypovolaemic but perfusing well, closed tib/fib fracture. HR 110, BP 100/60, Sp02 99% on air. Chest & pelvis NAD but severe abdominal bruising. Abdomen distended, tense, becoming peritonitic. Rectal NAD. Patient is, of course, booked for urgent transfer to trauma center. > As always, it depends... Do you do routine ultrasound your patients? Bladder filled? Empty bladder + free fluid -> suggestiv for bladder rupture. > 1) Do you catheterise this patient? > Yes. > 2) Suprapubic or transurethral? > transurethral (quick US mandatory, done by surgery at the bedside) > 3) If the patient is already catheterised and no urine is forthcoming (doc reports no difficulty in procedure), do you remove it? > No. A drop of dye in the catheter under fluoroscope / x-ray tells you more. > 4) Is this presentation suggestive of bladder rupture? > Not necessarily. Please report the findings. Cheers! Mathias
- Previous message: To catheterise or not to catheterise...
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
