Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
To catheterise or not to catheterise...
Dr Ross Hofmeyr wildmedic at gmail.comThu Mar 22 12:42:48 GMT 2007
- Previous message: Intraosseous Access
- Next message: R: To catheterise or not to catheterise...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all - quick views to settle collegial argument: (Remember- primary care setting, for all intents third world, 30 min transfer to first world academic/trauma center) 32 male pedestrian run over by minibus taxi. GCS 15, Resp NAD, hypovolaemic but perfusing well, closed tib/fib fracture. HR 110, BP 100/60, Sp02 99% on air. Chest & pelvis NAD but severe abdominal bruising. Abdomen distended, tense, becoming peritonitic. Rectal NAD. Patient is, of course, booked for urgent transfer to trauma center. 1) Do you catheterise this patient? 2) Suprapubic or transurethral? 3) If the patient is already catheterised and no urine is forthcoming (doc reports no difficulty in procedure), do you remove it? 4) Is this presentation suggestive of bladder rupture? I have my opinions, which were overridden by a senior colleague. I, of course, am right, (*grin*) but need ammo. Your thoughts? R. _____________________ Dr Ross Hofmeyr MBChB (Stell) ATLS ACLS wildmedic at gmail.com ross at wildmedix.com www.wildmedix.com
- Previous message: Intraosseous Access
- Next message: R: To catheterise or not to catheterise...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
