Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Thoracic Ao Transection
KMATTOX at aol.com KMATTOX at aol.comTue Mar 20 22:16:57 GMT 2007
- Previous message: Thoracic Ao Transection
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
1. First, in all due respect the CTA is a SCREENING tool, and STILL IS WITH THE FASTER SCANNERS. I continue to see far too many VOMITS from CT and CTA in the thoracic aorta. 2. Your hospital and your surgeons are in a better position at your trauma center to approach this patients management and timing of treatment than is the "Heart" Hospital. For a long list of reasons. 3. This patient is YOUNG. It is probable that his aorta is less than 22 mm in diameter. If so, the ONLY approved endograft is far too big and you risk enfolding, etc. With our current knowledge, unless this patient is really high risk, I would NOT recommend or support an endograft. 4. Because this patient is young and his aorta will dilate with age, I WOULD NOT put in an endograft for the long term unknowns of endografting. 5. Delay in surgery is appropriate in some patients, but do not delay too long if you are going to do him early. If you delay more than 3 days, you might wish to delay for 6 weeks or more. The delay in surgery categories and decisions were made during the days when decision trees were made from aortography, NOT CTA. DO NOT MAKE A DECESION TO WAIT FOR DELAYED REPAIR BASED ON THE CTA. Far too little supporting literature to defend you in court. 6. Just bite the bullet and do what is SAFEST. Do an aortogram. Make a decision about early or delayed treatment. Do the treatment in YOUR hospital. k ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
- Previous message: Thoracic Ao Transection
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
