Login
Site Search
Subscribe

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify

Modify

Home > List Archives

Study: No need to ban cell phones in hospitals

Thomas Anthony Horan thoran at sarah.br
Sun Mar 18 12:24:49 GMT 2007


I think we may be missing the point here. Safety first

RF interference exists; it may or may not be implicated in strange events in ICUs and air craft. Cell phones are not vital in either environment thus risk management should dictate non use until and only if the cell phone manufactureers can prove their safety in all conditions of use beyond doubt.

 What is the demand that makes it necessary for nurses and doctor and cleaners etc to call their hairdressers and girl friends and brokers on their fones from the ICU bed side?

tom

> ----------
> From: 	trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org[SMTP:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] on behalf of htaed_rd at 123mail.org[SMTP:htaed_rd at 123mail.org]
> Reply To: 	Trauma & Critical Care mailing list
> Sent: 	domingo, 18 de março de 2007 02:35
> To: 	Trauma & Critical Care mailing list
> Subject: 	Re: Study: No need to ban cell phones in hospitals
> 
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:03:51 -0400, rwolfer at aol.com said:
> > we have had problems within the last year with IVACS in the NICU and PICU
> > suddenly going to 999 in rate without numbers being changed. confirmed by
> > biomed that pumps had been working fine before hand. 
> > It was noted after
> > cell phones being used  close by.  Therefore, they are still banned here 
> 
> How do you confirm that something was working fine before a problem?
> 
> How do you know that this was the first evidence of a problem?
> 
> Was no other activity of any kind happening at the time of these events?
> 
> Was any effort made to reproduce these events?
> 
> I suspect that there were many other activities guilty of association
> with the adverse events that biomed states were not biomed's fault.
> 
> There is a problem.
> 
> There is a rule to protect patients.
> 
> There is very weak evidence to support blaming cellular phones.
> 
> There is evidence that the rule is does not work.
> 
> The decision is to continue this rule.
> 
> Were any other possible causes, aside from a record of recent
> malfunction, considered?
> 
> Tim Noonan.
> 
> 
> > Rebecca Wolfer, MD, FACS, FCCP
> > Associate Professor, Marshall University School of Medicine
> > Dept of Surgery
> > Director Thoracic Surgery
> > Director, Surgical Critical Care Cabell Huntington Hospital
> > Director, Trauma Cabell Huntington Hospital
> >  
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krin135 at aol.com
> > To: trauma-list at trauma.org
> > Sent: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:32 AM
> > Subject: Re: Study: No need to ban cell phones in hospitals
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > In a message dated 3/11/2007 8:14:02 PM Central Daylight Time,  
> > htaed_rd at 123mail.org writes:
> > 
> > The  hospitals are afraid of allowing anything that was once banned -
> > what if  something bad did happen? Oh my!
> > 
> > 
> > well, from an Radio Frequency Interference standpoint, there was a point
> > to  
> > the ban, 10 years ago, when bag phones could exceed 1 watt effective
> > radiated  
> > power, and many telemetry systems operated on frequencies in close
> > proximity 
> > to  the analog cell phone frequencies...
> >  
> > More of a problem was present when most telemetry systems operated on the 
> > 150-160 MHz bands shared with public service hand held radio
> > services...those  
> > old Motorola 'bricks' could produce up to 3 watts of power, and a medic's
> > or  
> > peace officer's radio could hash a whole telemetry wing.
> >  
> > with the much reduced power of the new digital phones, and the separation
> >  of 
> > most of the cell phone bands from the telemetry link bands, this is no
> > longer 
> >  a problem.
> >  
> > Same with the bans on pacemaker patients from microwave ovens...while
> > still  
> > theoretically a risk, when was the last time you actually saw a patient
> > who 
> > had  a problem from microwave *oven* exposure?
> >  
> > ck
> > Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP
> > <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers
> > free > 
> > email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
> > http://www.aol.com.
> > --
> > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free
> > from AOL at AOL.com.
> > --
> > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
> 


More information about the trauma-list mailing list