Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
IO's?...good for?
Matthew Reeds mgreeds at reeds.uk.comSat Mar 17 13:06:00 GMT 2007
- Previous message: IO's?...good for?
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As far as I am concerned, classical IO is an archaic tool and out-of-date and, like venous cutdown, should no longer be taught on ATLS. If it is not possible to get IV access and you really must resort to an alternative form of access, then could try the following:- 1)- BIG (Bone Injection Gun) - Never had a problem with this and not aware of the earlier problems reported with locking of the gun device. Only used when IV access unobtainable and really quick to insert (in my experience whilst most people still preparing to insert a traditional IO). This has a number of safety mechanisms to ensure safe, proper and effective insertion so don't see the reason for it failing. Would be interested to know more; 2)- F.A.S.T. 1 - Used a lot in the military and have some experience of this device. Great to use, very quick and simple to insert and (despite initial thoughts to the contrary) is relatively painfree. Although cannot be used in sternal fractures or those requiring a sternotomy, it is a very useful aid for those with multiple extremity fractures where IV and IO access is contraindicated etc. 3)- VEID - Could use this device to assist in getting IV access (attached to the IV cannula) where it appears obvious it won't be a useful straight-forward insertion due to poor circulation etc. How much volume were you trying to infuse?? I personally wouldn't be too worried about potential for volume infusion given that I apply permissive hypotension with either no fluids or, at the very most, low volume fluid resuscitation (just enough to maintain a femoral pulse.) This week I was referred by our Accident & Emergency department (amongst others) 3 multiple stabbings to both chest and abdomen and 2 severely injured polytrauma RTAs with head, facial, chest, spinal, abdominal, pelvic and extremity injuries (with prolonged entrapment times of near 1 hour.) Although 1 of the RTA victims had been out in the cold at 3am, wearing very little clothing and peripherally shutdown, I would have grabbed the BIG first (rather than IO) if I had had a problem with IV access (F.A.S.T. 1 contradindicated due to multiple sternal fractures, sterno-manubrial disruption, sterno-clavicular disruptions, pulmonary contusions and mycocardial contusions). Thankfully my ability to obtain IV access didn't let me down! Needless to say though I gave very little fluid anyway (in fact none at all!!!). Matthew Reeds Surgery U.K. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Nemeth [mailto:joe.nemeth at mcgill.ca] Sent: 16 March 2007 13:50 To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: IO's?...good for? our ED is thinking of purchasing high-end fancy-shmancy IO needles.... opinions/experiences on the necessity of these toys in tertiary care ED please? joe McGill University MOntreal
- Previous message: IO's?...good for?
- Next message: IO's?...good for?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
