Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
R: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission
Ronald Gross rgross at harthosp.orgMon Mar 5 13:52:27 GMT 2007
- Previous message: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission
- Next message: R: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter, No doubt that a little less war would be nice - and so would a winning lottery, neither of which you or I (well, maybe you...) will see any time soon. So at the present time, and for the forseeable future, I would suggest that the malaria research be done by the governments that have a much more vested interest in the disease given their own citizens' vulnerability to the parasite; the US needs to focus on the healthcare of the soldiers in the areas that the MAJORITY of its soldiers will be forced to deal - and that just isn't the malaria "epidemic" in our soldiers. Just my 2 cents. Ron PS - I wrote to Dodds and Lieberman. I plan on writing again. I did not hear Lieberman this AM (on trauma call and getting abused) but I hope to hear what he had to say so that I could target his comments a bit more closely. I ask that all on this list with an interset in the well-being of the kids who are bleeding and dying for us all please write and let your views known. I think that Ken's "talking points are right on, and I for one intent to repeat my thoughts - which are almost identical to his - to as many elected officials, including our President, as I can and have the time to do. >>> "peter" <taliente at tiscalinet.it> 03/05/07 8:40 AM >>> I think that maybe a little less war is better rather than reduce the spending on research, malaria is a world wide problem that causes millions of deaths in one year. I think that is very relevant rsearch!! Peter -----Messaggio originale----- Da: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] Per conto di KMATTOX at aol.com Inviato: lunedì 5 marzo 2007 14.11 A: med-events at ccm-l.org; trauma-list at trauma.org Oggetto: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission Senator Lieberman was just on National TV and made many of the points a great number of you have made on this list and to your Senators and Representatives. It is obvious that there will be a Congressional and Administrative investigation and Commissions. I have several suggestions as you continue to communicate your views to your congress people. 1. The fired Commanding Officer at Walter Reed was a sacrificial lamb. His career is ruined by this knee jerk firing, when others should have been the focus of reprisials. He might should be reinstated. 2. BRAC did make some good recommendations at the time, but those recommendations need to be reanalyzed in view of current war. Maybe other closures and consolidations are in order while expansions are in order in other areas. BRAC should have representatives from the civilian sector 3. A new Military Medicine Commission must not be politicized, but must include representatives from critical care, trauma, emergency medicine, etc. 4. Many within the Military Industrial Complex are spending money on things NOT of major concern during the time of THIS war. We have had over 16,000 MAJOR open amputations during the last 5 years in Iraq and Afghanistan and spent about $100,000 on research in this area. The Army and Navy spent $100 million on research on Malaria treatment last year while only 25 military people got malaria, most from not taking their drugs. I do not say get rid of appropriate research and development, just keep it relative. 5. It is long time that military medicine had a DEPUTY Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs rather than several layers down having an Assistant Secretary several layers down. 6. Except for Special Operations it is long overdue time that the military medical services be FUSED for that is the way they work right now, and very effectively. Military Medicine as taught by Uniformed Services University for Health Sciences at Bethesda is ALL SERVICE and serves as a model of the direction military medicine should go. A 3-4 star general doctor should also r epresent ALL military medicine at the joint chiefs of staff. leadership. Obviously some on this list have been able to communicate with Senator Lieberman, who is taking a lead in the Senate Commission. Let us help him and others keep focused. Kenneth L. Mattox, MD Houston <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ Confidentiality Notice This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
- Previous message: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission
- Next message: R: Walter Reed, Military Medicine, a New Commission
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
