Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
non-trauma surgeons doing trauma
Enrique Daza edazamd at verizon.netTue Jul 3 21:35:28 BST 2007
- Previous message: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma
- Next message: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The assumption would be that the high volume surgeons are trauma/critical care certified so that they do trauma full time and that low volume surgeons are "just" General Surgeons who cover on a per diem basis to make up for the deficit in surgeons willing to go into trauma. The whole acute care premise would then hold that General Surgery is Trauma and Trauma/Acute Care Surgery is General Surgery. No? The American Board of Surgery certainly thinks so. Somewhere I read that 90% of trauma in the country is managed by non Trauma/Critical Care certified General Surgeons. This would include inner city and rural setting, penetrating and non penetrating trauma. And let's face it, trauma has become a non operative venture most of the time, even low velocity penetrating. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald Gross" <Rgross at harthosp.org> To: "Trauma & Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:17 PM Subject: Re: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma OK, so now define high volume and low volume!! Given the act that in most trauma centers outside of the inner city where penetrating trauma is usually only 10-20% of the cases seen, most trauma care involves non-operative management, are those surgeons high volume or low volume surgeons? In order to be called a trauma surgeon (high volume be damned), does one need to be critical care certified? To be defined as a trauma surgeon, do you have to be trauma/critical care fellowship trained? Sorry Enrique, but you are gonna have to do a helluva lot better then that!!! Ron >>> "Enrique Daza" <edazamd at verizon.net> 7/3/2007 3:41 PM >>> High Volume surgeons would be considered the full time trauma surgeons and low volume surgeons would likely be non-trauma on full time surgeons. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Valerie Malka" <osiris11_2000 at yahoo.com> To: "Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 1:27 AM Subject: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma > Dear List > > Does anyone have any references or know of any research/studies which > have been done looking at outcomes of trauma patients treated by > non-trauma surgeons vs trauma surgeons ? > > Thankyou for your help > > Regards > > Valerie Malka > > > Dr Valerie Malka MBBS,FRACS,MIPH > Director of Trauma Services > Department of Surgery > Westmead Hospital > Westmead, Sydney > Australia, 2145 > > Tel: 612 9845 7072 > Fax: 612 9845 8321 > Website: www.westmeadtrauma.org > Website: www.austraumaconference.org > > --------------------------------- > Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of > spyware protection. > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ Confidentiality Notice This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary information which is legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please promptly contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma
- Next message: non-trauma surgeons doing trauma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
