Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
TBI/GCS
Bjorn, Pret pbjorn at emh.orgTue Feb 20 14:41:08 GMT 2007
- Previous message: TBI/GCS
- Next message: TBI/GCS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This from PubMed: Chesnut RM. Care of central nervous system injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;87(1):119-56, vii. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359766, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA. chesnutr at u.washington.edu The primary method of improving outcome from traumatic brain injury is through avoiding secondary insults to the injured brain. Although surgery is important, most management is critical care. Evidence-based guidelines continue to be developed to assist in directing care. With modern monitoring systems, a physiologic-based approach is increasingly applicable, allowing focused treatment for intracranial hypertension and ischemia. It is important to balance and integrate the care of the injured brain into the overall care of the polytrauma patient. PMID: 17127126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Randy Chestnut is arguably among the top two or three contemporary authorities in neurosurgery -- being polite and generous to the other one or two, whomever they are. These are recent and (apparently) exhaustive recommendations. I've asked for a copy from our medical library. As for the GCS (speaking from memory here, and grateful for any corrections from the List): a score of three in the absence of exogenous chemistry is a dismal prognostic finding, and I'm quite sure there are correlates for morbidity, mortality, complication, and functional return, right on up through the scale. There are other scores and scales available, and the GCS has its critics, but it can't be beat for accessibility, inter-rater reliability, or broad recognition. As far as I am aware, while the GCS is prominent among the indications for ICP monitoring, it is not so good at triage for craniotomy. Think about all the DAI we see. Hope this helps, and I look forward to other replies. This is good stuff to review periodically. Pret Bjorn, RN Bangor, ME USA -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of David Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:34 AM To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list Subject: TBI/GCS I took the TBI course yesterday and we learned about keeping a pt with ?TBI w/ a bp 90mm s, and a SpO2 of at least 90%, this information was accurate as of 98, just wondering if there have been any changes to this thought process, and is an early GCS score in field a helpful predictor or pt outcome in the hospital? and whether or not this pt has neurosurgery or not? Just trying to spark a convo dave sullivan BA NREMT-P --------------------------------- We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: TBI/GCS
- Next message: TBI/GCS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
