Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Physician Extenders (was RE: trauma-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 16)
Krin135 at aol.com Krin135 at aol.comTue Dec 18 16:52:11 GMT 2007
- Previous message: Physician Extenders (was RE: trauma-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 16)
- Next message: Physician Extenders (was RE: trauma-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 16)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message dated 18-Dec-07 10:40:46 Central Standard Time, Lorick at Lorick.org writes: That is a fairly unusual requirement in this day and age. In fact, I didn't think any State still required that. Louisiana does not nor does Missouri (although it does have rather restrictive language) require the physician to be present. Interesting...this has changed in the last three years then, as I know of two docs who lost their licenses over allowing their PAs to work that independently in Louisiana prior to 2005. Admittedly, those docs also lost their Care/Caid status for improper billing (doc rates instead of PA rates), but IIRC, the write up in the BME newsletter was for 'improper supervision.' And in areas where there have been PAs here in MO, I've had to read and sign some pretty restrictive contracts to supervise group PAs, but that could be either hospital or billing restrictions as well. ck Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
- Previous message: Physician Extenders (was RE: trauma-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 16)
- Next message: Physician Extenders (was RE: trauma-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 16)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
