Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Va Tech disaster recommendations
Charlene M Morris cvmmorris at gmail.comFri Aug 31 14:52:34 BST 2007
- Previous message: Va Tech disaster recommendations
- Next message: Va Tech disaster recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I read this account yesterday and was furious that it was reported "things could have been done better". As it is said, hindsight is 20/15 (NOT 20/20, IMO!!) and yes-- as in all bad results, there are a series of problems. Let's not buy into culpability when all are punished. Perhaps with this sentinel event, things will change. THAT is the true test. C M Morris On 8/31/07, Jeffrey Hammond <hammond at umdnj.edu> wrote: > > The formal report from the State of Virginal on the shooting at Virginia > Tech has been released. At 260 pages it is a bit much to read but the EMS, > Hospital, and Emergency Management responses were investigated and outlined > from page 100 to page 122. I've copied the key findings and recommendations > below. > The report should be commended for not concentrating solely on EMS and > pre-hospital issues. There are a few gaps (e.g. what role did the surgeons > gaining emergency credentialing play at other hospitlas; what pre-event > training did the hospitalists have, etc), and some of the operational > details are sparse, but in general I found the report sound and a good > example of what we should endeavor to do in future events. "Lessons learned" > are still those we haven't learned yet from previous events, i.e. > communications disconnects, failure to effectively use HICS, delays in > opening an EOC, questionable value of triage tags, obstacles to patient > tracking and dissonance between healthcare and police disaster plans for > example. Nevertheless, it seems clear that pre-event coordination, > planning and exercises paid handsome dividends. > > Two "medical" aspects of the report bear special attention I think: > 1) The discussion of post-event psychological support for healthcare > personnel is directed at pre-hospitl providers and ignores the needs of > hospital staff; 2) The recommendation to include hospitalists more > prominantly in a disaster response plan is a good one. Hospitalist and house > physician staff are not generally target groups for disaster training or > involved in disaster drills (especially at facilities which are resident > heavy), and in my experience an often overlooked resource. > > I suspect this report will be the subject of discussion and debate in the > near future as new aspects and insights emerge. > > The full report can also be seen at: > http://www.governor.Virginia.gov/TempContent/techPanelReport.cfm<http://www.governor.virginia.gov/TempContent/techPanelReport.cfm> > > * > > KEY FINDINGS > > Positive Lessons > * > The EMS responses to the West Ambler Johnston residence hall and Norris > Hall occurred in a timely manner. Initial triage by the two tactical > medics accompanying > the police was appropriate in identifying patient viability. > > The application of a tourniquet to control a severe femoral artery bleed > was likely a lifesaving event. > > Patients were correctly triaged and transported to appropriate medical > facilities. > > The incident was managed in a safe manner, with no rescuer injuries > reported. > > Local hospitals were ready for the patient surge and employed their NIMS > ICS plans and managed patients well. > > All of the patients who were alive after the Norris Hall shooting survived > through discharge from the hospitals. > > Quick assessment by a hospitalist of emergency department patients waiting > for disposition helped with preparedness and patient flow at one hospital. > > The overall EMS response was excellent, and the lives of many were saved. > > EMS agencies demonstrated an exceptional working relationship, likely an > outcome of interagency training and drills. > > *Areas for Improvement* > ** > All EMS units were initially dispatched by the Montgomery County > Communications Center to respond to the scene; this was contrary to the > request. > > There was a 4-minute delay between VTRS monitoring the incident (9:42 a.m.) > on the police radio and its being dispatched by police (9:46 > a.m.). > > Virginia Tech police and the Montgomery County Communications Center > issued separate dispatches. This can lead to confusion in an EMS response. > > BVRS was initially unaware that VTRS had already set up an EMS command > post. This could have caused a duplication of efforts and further > organizational challenges. Participants interviewed noted that once a BVRS > officer reported to the EMS command post, communications between EMS > providers on the scene improved. > > Because BVRS and VTRS are on separate primary radio frequencies, BVRS > reportedly did not know where to stage their units. In addition, BVRS > units were reportedly unaware of when the police cleared the building for > entry. > > Standard triage tags were used on some patients but not on all. The tags > are part of the Western Virginia EMS Trauma Triage Protocol. Their use > could have assisted the hospitals with patient tracking and record > management. Some patients were identified by room number in the emergency > department and their records became difficult to track. > > The police order to transport the deceased under emergency conditions from > Norris Hall to the medical examiners office in Roanoke was inappropriate. > > The lack of a local EOC and fully functioning RHCC may lead to > communications and operational issues such as hospital liaisons being sent to > the scene. If each hospital sent a liaison to the scene, the command post > would have been overcrowded. > > A unified command post should have been established and operated based on > the NIMS ICS model. > > Failure to open an EOC immediately led to communications and coordination > issues during the incident. > > Communications issues and barriers appeared to be frustrating during the > incident. > > *RECOMMENDATIONS* > > *IX-1 Montgomery County, VA should* *develop a countywide emergency > medical **services, fire, and law enforcement communications **center to > address the issues of **interoperability and economies of scale.* > *IX-2 A unified command post should be established and operated based on > the** **National Incident Management System **Incident Command System > model. *For this incident, law enforcement would have been the lead > agency. > ** > *IX-3 Emergency personnel should use the **National Incident Management > System **procedures for nomenclature, resource typing **and utilization, > communications, **interoperability, and unified command.* > ** > *IX-4 An emergency operations center must **be activated early during a > mass casualty **incident.* > ** > *IX-5 Regional disaster drills should be **held on an annual basis. *The > drills should include hospitals, the Regional Hospital Coordinating > Center, all appropriate public safety and state agencies, and the medical > examiner's office. They should be followed by a formal postincident > evaluation. > ** > *IX-6 To improve multi-casualty incident **management, the Western > Virginia Emergency **Medical Services Council should **review/revise the > Multi-Casualty Incident **Medical Control and the Regional Hospital **Coordinating > Center functions. * > ** > *IX-7 Triage tags, patient care reports, or standardized Incident Command > System forms must be completed accurately and retained after a > multi-casualty incident.* They are instrumental in evaluating each > component of a multi-casualty incident. > > *IX-8 Hospitalists, when available, should **assist with emergency > department patient **dispositions in preparing for a multicasualty* > *incident patient surge.* > ** > *IX-9 Under no circumstances should the **deceased be transported under > emergency **conditions. *It benefits no one and increases the > likelihood of hurting others. > ** > *IX-10 Critical incident stress management **and psychological services > should continue **to be available to EMS providers as needed.* > > ** > ** > * Jeffrey Hammond MD, MPH > Chief, Trauma/Surgical Critical Care > Robert Wood Johnson Medical School > New Brunswick, NJ > * > > * * > > -- > trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG <http://trauma.org/> > To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: > http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ >
- Previous message: Va Tech disaster recommendations
- Next message: Va Tech disaster recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
