Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Avoiding EMTALA (...and Crossposted)
Mike Smertka medic0947969 at yahoo.comSun Aug 26 03:53:29 BST 2007
- Previous message: Avoiding EMTALA (...and Crossposted)
- Next message: Medicare changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It is hard to find a happy medium in stopping the practice of transfering minor patients by exploiting loopholes, particularly after the "wallet biopsy." I would offer that facilities that transfer minor patients should not be eligible for reimbursement or billing at all, but then these facilities would compensate by keeping patients with issues well beyond their capability. The economic damage to patients (without insurance) is extreme. A bill from EMS, another bill form 1st facility and physician, a transfer bill (especially on an aircraft), and bills from the receiving facility and physicians. Might as well have an automatic bankruptcy filing as soon as 911 is called. Some of these transfers man be simply cultural (faster and easier to transfer than to get somebody on call to come in) , or for less malicious reasons such as " I am not comfortable with this treating this patient." What about the issue of free standing EDs? I can bet, if a person with a fx comes in one there is probably not an ortho surgeon there. Mobile ICU or aircraft transfer waiting to happen. I still teach EMS classes, but getting providers to think about "appropriate" facilities is a lost cause. The nearest MD or DO in a building that says "emergency" so a squad can get back in service for the next "big one." trumps all medical care in my experience. Mike krin135 at aol.com wrote: Neither states medicaid will pay us much of anything because " we are out of state". when we fix the usual minor problem and just need placement or something , the referring hospitals refuse? to take pt back, as "they dont have insurance and we cant get paid.? It is really becoming a burden on the trauma centers. Dr. Wolfer: Something that we did in the 'border parishes' of Louisiana was to apply for Arkansas, Mississippi or Texas (depending on the location) Medicaid provider numbers. Since these were in an underserved area, and many patients came to us for care because there was no closer 'in state' facility, we had at least the basic Medicaid payment for re imbursment. I believe that there are some hospitals in Missouri with similar situations who have done much the same thing in regards to Arkansas and Tennessee. ck Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP -----Original Message----- From: rwolfer at aol.com To: trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 8:05 pm Subject: Re: Avoiding EMTALA (...and Crossposted) InWV we see it all the time, even with Drs on call in specialty at referring hospital.? It is more common after the "wallet biospy". they all claim the the pt with fracture is trauma ( isloated fracture) and must go to trauma center. If pt has insurance they never seem to send it but take care of it themselves. As we are a tristate area we? also get pts from KY and OH. Neither states medicaid will pay us much of anything because " we are out of state". when we fix the usual minor problem and just need placement or something , the referring hospitals refuse? to take pt back, as "they dont have insurance and we cant get paid.? It is really becoming a burden on the trauma centers. Rebecca Wolfer, MD, FACS, FCCP Associate Professor, Marshall University School of Medicine Dept of Surgery Director Thoracic Surgery Director, Surgical Critical Care Cabell Huntington Hospital Director, Trauma Cabell Huntington Hospital -----Original Message----- From: KMATTOX at aol.com To: SURGINET at listserv.utoronto.ca; trauma-list at trauma.org Sent: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:51 pm Subject: Avoiding EMTALA (...and Crossposted) I had the in house acute care surgery and trauma call last night. Between responding to more than 15 code 2 & 3 trauma activations, 5 operations, continuing my week long www research into cross posting, I received more than half a dozen calls from area hospitals, some of them quite large. I had very pleasant discussions with the emergency room physicians and we had both clinical and "their backup" type discussions. We talked about the management of the clinical conditions. And YES, I accepted all of the patients. My first response was, "Yes, I am going to accept your referral, now let's talk about the patient and anything else you wish to talk about." I did this even though we were quite full, because both the patient and the calling doctor was not the ones responsible for the predicament they found themselves in. Each of the emergency doctors were surprised I just accepted the patient up front so readily. I did tell them, that if we found that the condition was of a very minor nature, I would give them a call back and we would discuss what they could have done at their local ER. At issue here is an INCREASING practice of emergency departments and backup specialty call. Apparently Texas hospitals have discovered that there is a loophole in the EMTALA law which states that if a hospital has specialists on the staff, but because of the number of specialist, it would be a burden for them to be on excessive numbers of call nights, then the call roster will just be empty or devoid of a name for that specialty for that night. The doctors last night told me that some nights they have NO names on any of their call rosters and on NO night is there at least 1-3 empty spaces. EMTALA then stipulates that although the hospital has a specialist on the medical staff, they do not have a duty to call in that specialist unless her/his name is on a call roster. None of the cases last night were immediately life threatening. The patient conditions (among others) included: corneal abrasion, fractured pelvis, painful abdomen (LLQ) and WBC of 19,000 with suspected diverticulitis, and multiple different hand trauma calls. I have discovered that for more than 70% of the time, the BTGH is the only hospital with a "hand surgeon" on the call roster in a 9 county area, whether or not the patient has a funding source. I encountered for the first time a very interesting mechanism for transfer. The patient with the acute abdomen who I readily accepted in transfer, was checked out by the sending doctor, and then the registration area of the emergency room arranged the transfer. They gave him a printed copy of a MapQuest route to get to our hospital. This is not a new problem and we have been addressing it in open and regulatory forums (we being the hospital administration and the regional trauma council, etc.). Apparently, this is allowable by EMTALA. My reason for this post is to alert each of you to this practice and to ask about its prevalence. Ironically, it is used MORE in patients with no resources. I am crossposting because this issue has significant interest to both groups and according to my research is totally within the etiquette of the Internet. k ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
- Previous message: Avoiding EMTALA (...and Crossposted)
- Next message: Medicare changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
