Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Question for the prehospital experts
Pond Life pondlife at emergency-care-practitioner.comMon Aug 20 17:52:49 BST 2007
- Previous message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Next message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Paul, You are absolutely right. Should not have placed the patient straight onto the stretcher mattress - should have been on a vac matt. Stupid of me to compromise my overall care. Lesson learnt and it won't happen again. Still reading the rest of your post - you worked hard on this one...! Mike -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Paul.Harrison at sth.nhs.uk Sent: 20 August 2007 13:05 To: trauma-list at trauma.org Subject: RE: Question for the prehospital experts Mike, JRCALC guidelines were updated last year although I know from correspondence that not all trusts have updated or rolled out new training. Preferred journey time on spinal board is now < 30mins but option of either placing patient on vacuum mattress (and all attendant issues with that) or continuing on spinal board with longer journey time having informed receiving A&E of this. No indication in any version of JRCALC that if spinal board contraindicated due to journey time that patient should be placed on basic stretcher mattress. Most obvious problem in this instance is what method to be used in A&E to transfer to their trolley with minimum delay. Original research using real SCI patients 14-55yrs 'immobilised' on spinal boards showed pressure sores did not achieve significance until after 6 hours immobility. In UK, majority patients off within 2 hours of application. Standards on arrival in A&E are not consistent between hospitals, between staff within A&E departments, between experienced nurses and junior doctors, between clinicians and managers etc etc. The vast majority of people experiencing spinal protective devices resulted from a professional emergency responder making a judgement call at the scene of the accident, utilising training derived from a national curriculum. There is a greater consistency and inter-rater reliability in the application of these devices by UK paramedics than in their continued use/removal after arrival in A&E. Personally, I would say scene-of-incident errors occur due to paramedics deviating from established national practice guidelines whereas in-hospital errors occur because of a lack of the same. The rewrite of SIA's Managing Spinal Cord Injury: The First 48 Hours' (www.spinal.co.uk <http://www.spinal.co.uk/> ) summarises the ongoing debate on the issue of applying spinal protective devices from UK perspective, going far beyond current JRCALC guidelines and offering a completely revised assessment questionnaire for informing the removal of spinal protective devices. Male driver 53, parked at traffic lights. Rear-end shunt at ~ 10mph. Claims no neurological change or neck pain on examination. Walked to ambulance for 'precautionary' check-up in A&E. Paramedic failed to note headrest removed from driver's seat. Sat upright in ambulance during 15 minute journey. On arrival in A&E unable to move legs, hands, arms - definitive C5/6 tetraplegia. Male, 43, farmer. Driving tractor with open-back cab towing trailer stacked with bales of hay. Bale falls from top onto back of neck. Gets out of cab. Climbs onto trailer carrying bale. Re-secures load. Proceeds home. Unloads trailer. Enters house, showers, sits down to dinner and says to wife 'If my neck still hurts tomorrow I'll go to hospital'. Enters A&E 0930 next day (after completing morning milking etc, explains accident to triage nurse who walks him to trolley bay asked to undress and lie on trolley. Taken to x-ray - subluxation of C5-6. noted - no ensuing neurological impairment. From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Pond Life Sent: 17 August 2007 19:00 To: 'Trauma & Critical Care mailing list' Subject: RE: Question for the prehospital experts I have recently been involved in an incident where this happened. Both myself and another paramedic (both very experienced) identified there was no indication to place the patient into a collar (and therefore onto a board) as per our JRCALC guidelines here in the UK. I walked the patient to the ambulance and a doctor (who was on scene) said that he felt uncomfortable that we hadn't placed a collar on the patient because of the MOI. I respect the doctor concerned within his field in the ER, however he does not respond to EMS MVA's and was out of his normal environment. In an effort to not rock the boat (and not because the patient clinically required it), I placed a collar on the patient and a blanket log roll around the head and then strapped the patient to the stretcher. In the UK, if journey times for such patients are greater than 20 minutes the spinal board is contraindicated. Got to the ER and three things happened? 1. We were criticized for not placing the patient on a board - I was embarrassed for the staff as they were not up to date on our guidelines (2004). 2. The junior ER doctor in the ER performed a c-spine check which was at best sub-optimal - didn't even feel the c-spine! Certainly well short of our c-spine examination guidelines. The doc was then bullied by a nurse into writing up an x-ray just to prove a point that the patient required it and we should have placed the patient on a board. 3. and then to top it all... the ER dept ('suspecting a c-spine injury!!') only taped the head and neck down of the patient. When I pointed out that this did not constitute spinal immobilization and was in fact was inherently dangerous we left the dept in disgust. I learnt a bunch of lessons that day. Most of which related to out dated and poor care in the ER. A bad experience Mike Bjarkoy. Paramedic. UK. -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Ben Reynolds Sent: 17 August 2007 03:00 To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list Subject: Question for the prehospital experts When, if ever is it acceptable for a patient involved in an MVA to be made to walk from the car into the back of the ambulance to be boarded and collared? Use the following example from which to springboard your answer: 21 year old restrained female head on collision with a stationary vehicle. Airbags deploy. Patient has a large cut on her head but is out and walking around. Ben Reynolds, PA-C Pittsburgh, PA -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/ -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Next message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
