Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Interhospital Quality Improvement
Robert F. Smith rfsmithmd at comcast.netMon Aug 20 17:04:53 BST 2007
- Previous message: Surginet (was: Interhospital Quality Improvement)
- Next message: Interhospital Quality Improvement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Boy, you leave the list for a few hours and WWIII breaks out. I realize this is the Athens of America, The Mecca; but the case we discussed a couple of days ago didn't engender this level of hyperbole. (Not knowing the hospital, I doubt we're talking about an esteemed institution on Fruit St. as their doors are one way valves.) As Dr. Hammond points out, instead of Pret for once, the level of geo-specific detail in this discussion is problematic and IMHO does not serve a purpose. Except to establish that there is a trauma system in place and the lead agency (dare we use Dr. David Boyd's terminology in polite company?) is the Mass DPH. It's impossible for me to believe that a trauma system was implemented without an Oversight Process. If not, do what Pret says, but shame on them. Also shame on them if they did not establish a credentialing process for who can serve as the on call trauma attending. But just because you have a trauma system, or a car, does not mean it will always function exactly as you intended. And as Dr. Mattox noted this is, unfortunately, not an uncommon occurrence. Geographically, most of our country does not have access to organized trauma care. For a country that rightly or wrongly prides itself on the level of health care we have that is inexcusable. Universal access to organized trauma care should be a national priority. Rob Smith -----Original Message----- From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn, Pret Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:49 AM To: SURGINET: General Surgery Discussion List; Trauma & Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: Interhospital Quality Improvement Dr. Glantz, These comments, such as they are, on the invitation of Dr. Mattox from the Trauma and Critical Care Mailing List: In the absence of an organized and pre-defined process for PI/QI at the system level, I'd recommend a simple but urgent debriefing among key players, including relevant directors at each agency. Solicit an objective third party mediator (e.g., chief of another trauma program), and allow yourself 2-plus hours and ample pizza and soft drinks. Require a confidentiality agreement, and carefully record attendance. Put your timeline on PowerPoint, and edit the presentation as you cooperatively present it with those involved. Summarize recommendations at the conclusion, and save the .ppt as minutes. Follow up as directed. Strive for the debrief within a week; anything after two will be pointless by comparison. Over time, people are apt to forget or invent. This needn't be difficult or even especially uncomfortable, especially if you rightly assume that a) none of the players is an abject idiot, b) none wanted to do anything besides help this poor fellow, and c) all want to know how to not screw up in the future. Indeed, you'll probably find plenty to learn yourself. You're all part of the same team, but even all-stars have to talk in the locker room and go over the plays. I've never left a debriefing with hard feelings. That happens when you DON'T debrief. Pret Bjorn Trauma Coordinator Eastern Maine Medical Center Bangor, ME USA -----Original Message----- From: SURGINET: General Surgery Discussion List [mailto:SURGINET at listserv.utoronto.ca] On Behalf Of andyglantz at aol.com Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 2:36 PM To: SURGINET at listserv.utoronto.ca Subject: Re: Interhospital Quality Improvement Fellow Surginetters, I'm sure that all of you that work at tertiary care facilities have all received "train wreck" transfers from other hospitals. How do you handle the QI issues in a "politically correct" fashion? Let me present this mornings case to you and get some comments from some of you. The patient was a 35 year old man, who was apparently riding his bicycle home from work at about 4am this morning. He stated to the paramedics who arrived at the scene shortly later that he was struck by a car, and that the car drove off without stopping. It is impossible to determine how long he had been "down". He arrived at the local "regional medical center" at 4:59am. At this hospital he was resuscitated with about 3 liters of crystalloid (he even had an IV on the dorsum of his left foot). His vital signs were reported by all to be "stable", with a hemoglobin of 11.6 and then 10. A CT scan of his abdomen was performed, revealing a grade IV liver injury, with segments 6 and 7 completely shattered and a moderate amount of hemoperitoneum. A "surgical consultation" was requested and he was seen by the local surgeon "on-call" who was apparently a bariatric / minimally-invasive surgeon, with less than 2 years experi! ence in private practice. Transfer was arranged, blood for transfusion was "ordered", and the helicopter was called. According to the Emergency Dept staff, his vital signs remained "stable." The chopper staff arrived there at about 7:30 and he arrived at our facility at about 8am. No blood was ever transfused, nor was he sent to us with any blood on hand. Upon arrival to us, his BP was 60 (on high dose pressors), his hemoglobin was 8 and his arterial pH was 7.00. We quickly placed a large "trauma" IV line, started transfusing 4 units of PRBC's. His BP remained at about 60, the IR staff was called, but it was going to take at least an hour to start possible embolization on a Sunday morning. We then rushed him up to the OR. We had his belly open by 8:45am, a Pringle tourniquet on at 9:21, segments 6 and 7 in a basin by 9:50, 5.3 liters of cellsaver blood saved (and transfused back), 20+ units of PRBC's, 10 units! of FFP, and 5 units of platelets transfused. We did a median st ernotomy at about 10:00am, when he went into v-fib. The RUQ was packed with lap pads during this time and there was NO major hemorrhage from the liver at this point. Despite heroic efforts over the next 50 minutes, his pH continued to drop from 7.00, to 6.97, to 6.88, and finally 6.77. His temperature at this point was 34 degrees. He was 33 degrees at the start of the case. He received several rounds of bicarb, intracardiac epi, IV calcium, etc, etc, etc. He was pronounced at 10:47am. Any comments? Andy Glantz Boston Medical Center ________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> . -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
- Previous message: Surginet (was: Interhospital Quality Improvement)
- Next message: Interhospital Quality Improvement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
