Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Comments
Tom Riley tgariley at hotmail.comSun Aug 19 22:07:48 BST 2007
- Previous message: [ccm-l] Fwd: Interhospital Quality Improvement
- Next message: Massachusetts & Joint Commission Review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In light of the request for more comments, From a scared Lurker - with the proviso that there are definitely many more qualified people here than me (feel free to skip it!): <Sal Impediments to Angiography> Angios: I'm aware of at least one hospital, generally great for trauma (where I'd ask to go), where the angiosuite is at the end of a very long corridor a long way from the OR & A&E resus which reduces the number of unstable patients going there. <Level 1 versus Level 3 RIP 2 hours later in CT> Just out of interest was that the patients *second* CT? the first posting of the case included a report of a CT. If so what was the rationale given for doing a CT again? The reason for most delays in critical patients is a hospitals culture. Most hospitals Ive experienced are organised and judge themselves against targets for non-emergency care not to deal with critically injured patients. It needs to be a hospital wide attitude - to get the best management of an unstable patient you need a sharp ED [a sharp radiological team (to say no!)] and a sharp surgical department. One won't do and it needs to be all aspects of the departments, nursing and doctors. If this isnt the case the sharp departments or parts of departments tend to become frustrated and give up. If theres nobody in a department whos interested in Trauma it wont get looked at. Also many hospitals that are good in office hours can be really poor out of hours when everyone goes home. Again most of the time they get away with not being that quick and if they dont its often not questioned in depth its just that she/he died of that injury, we couldnt save her/him, too bad or it was out of hours. Just out of interest what are the gurus advice for junior doctors who find themselves working in departments which arent very sharp? <Selective spinal immobilisation> My personal opinions on spinal immobilisation: There are definitely many patients who are immobilised who don't need it - the statistics from the EMJ article posted state only 4% have an unstable spinal fracture (I'm surprised it's this high). However spinal immobilisation is a "precautionary" measure - it doesn't treat anything, similarly wearing gloves is precautionary against infection - most of the time you'd be fine without them... Not immobilising the patient would therefore be fine 96% of the time. However I recall (memory!) from the PHTLS manual that 70% of the people who are left quadriplegic post trauma are due to their handling after the incident so better safe than sorry? As its only 4% incidence any study (e.g. NEXUS) looking into this needs *thousands* of patients to be statistically significant and then the pre-hospital environment is so variable who's to say it's applicable? One patient I immobilised was drunk in the stands of Twickenham rugby ground on a freezing November afternoon, how many studies are going to cover that to a statistically significant degree? Similarly there's no point in immobilising the c-spine if its going to result in a corpse, there are numerous examples of people who've died in RTA / MVCs due to not having their airways opened by first aiders who didn't want to move them (the 7mins response from an ambulance - too late). Similarly London HEMS recently attended a pedestrian who'd been pushed through a wall by a car and on arrival was under the front of the car and arrested, they rapidly pulled them out with MILS alone and successfully resuscitated them he could have been quadriplegic but hed definitely have been dead otherwise. Another question I was taught that with penetrating knife trauma and asymptomatic neurology the risks of an unstable spinal injury were negligible and it was unnecessary to immobilise a patient. In the case given the patient was drunk so you could argue the neurology was unreliable but Im interested to know - would other people have immobilised him had they known hed been stabbed? Conversely - I have been *ordered* to immobilise someone who was walking, felt a pain in their back whilst reaching across a table with a previous history of a fractured coccyx, tender over the ipsilateral infraspinatus muscle with & paraesthisiae in right hand. Quite the most embarrassing handover of my life. <Is the spine board/Long back board effective?> I'm not a great fan of the rescue board (aka long backboard, spinalboard etc.) for spinal immobilisation - if you strap someone on it and then roll it 90 degrees you can see how much lateral movement there is (and it's American:-)). I much prefer the scoop stretcher (British:-)) which you can split reducing the amount of logroll required and get less movement once they're on it, plus you get it back quicker when you deliver the patient:-). Vacuum mattresses are also great once someone's on a trolley/Bed, very comfortable fewer/no pressure worries, but I'm not convinced you can really safely pick someone up on one with just two people and they do make it more difficult to examine the patient. Rescue boards are great for sliding people onto during extractions, under trains or carrying people up flights of stairs. I'm also a great fan of TED or similar jackets, for taking people out of cars/seats - especially single seater racing cars. <British System of ED care> After recent experience of Australian EDs, *most* of the British EDs are definitely more casualty than emergency medicine. Its interesting that in Australia most Intensive care specialists have an Emergency medicine background rather than the Anaesthetics background in the UK. Although the common stem in the MMC training scheme may alter this. <Mathew The great pre hospital v hospital, doctors out of their environment> As someone who sits (hides?) on both sides of the fence (with a physics degree:-)). The laws of physics aren't different outside of hospital but they do affect medicine in different ways - there's no rain/snow/hail/wind, noisy traffic, sirens, dark, casualties with a smashed up car wrapped round them/down a hole/up a mountain/3 stories down in an underground rave/on the 6th floor in a dodgy housing estate with all the neighbours/bystanders regarding you, in a uniform, as a symbol of authority which rightly or wrongly they're blaming for what's happened. This does make it a much more difficult environment to work in - is that anaesthesia/paraesthesia in his hands are they just numb from cold? Are there absent breathsounds or is it just I can't hear them over the music/traffic/siren? How do I achieve a platinum 10/diamond 5 (or whatever pointless number) when the front of the crashed cars sitting on the patients lap? Plus there's only one paramedic/technician in the back of an ambulance, or the two crew initially for potentially many patients - versus all the staff in ED. But the medicine and physiology *isn't different* and hospital doctors are better trained, very capable and very practised at doing things that paramedics just don't do or deal with that often. Theres nobody to handover to for them - For example ITU/Anaesthetists do multiple intubations, cannulations and deal with people being sliced open & losing blood and being unstable routinely every day. Vascular surgeons routinely take legs off. I'm not saying you don't get bad examples in both fields: Examples I've seen - A&E doctor with patient post blunt head trauma having cranial nerves examined without any C-spine precautions/clearance, "turn your head against my hand" "OW! that hurts my neck". The Paramedic crew "immobilising" a patient (pedestrian v car, 30mph, bulls eye impact pattern on the cars windscreen with his hair in the outside of it. No symptoms available - patient only spoke chinese) Picking him up by one arm each and dragging him on his back onto a board then taping his head down with blanket rolls. No collar, no straps. Lifted onto cot, loaded and drove off... But in general both prehospital and hospital do a great job, both really do know what they're talking about and deserve each other's respect, even when you think they don't know what they're talking about it's quite possible they know more than you and really should be listened too and yes I do take my own advice - that's why this is only my second ever posting - I stand to be corrected and please don't flame/abuse me too much:-)! Tom Riley Scared Medical Student, volunteer ambulance crew, Former Physicist, MAU and A&E care assistant. _________________________________________________________________ Got a favourite clothes shop, bar or restaurant? Share your local knowledge http://www.backofmyhand.com
- Previous message: [ccm-l] Fwd: Interhospital Quality Improvement
- Next message: Massachusetts & Joint Commission Review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
