Login
Site Search
Subscribe
Modify
Home >
List Archives
Question for the prehospital experts
Matthew Reeds mgreeds at reeds.uk.comSat Aug 18 19:39:53 BST 2007
- Previous message: New Intern, Resident, Internist, Family Practioner, -- CT Scan
- Next message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave, If a patient is combative and has a reduced GCS with a potential for a spinal injury, then they should be immobilised - that is easy. However, a patient's refusal to be immobilised is usually due either to:- (a) confusion as a result of hypovolaemia/hypoxia, (b) apprehension (c) inability to comprehend the events and they should be gently coaxed to comply with immobilisation. If they can't and remain aggressive and you are PRE-HOSPITAL then I suppose that there is not much that you can do about it and forcing immobilisation upon them can do more harm than good and you must just keep the patients as still as you possibly can...by no means an easy thing to achieve in such a patient. A different situation may arise where the patient has capacity and understands the potential outcome of the circumstances but merely makes a "competent" decision to do so. This is an issue relating to consent more than a medical one and actions vary depending upon the laws of consent/common law etc. which are different from country to country. In your particular case, I was not there and therefore cannot appreciate the severity of the MOI but I will make various assumptions here, the first of which is that it was significant (given the findings that you describe.) You SHOULD have been immobilised at the scene, but clearly you weren't. I therefore assume that you had no injury (and also that you sustained no SUBSEQUENT spinal injury etc.) You may have been either "lucky" or you just had no injury as a result of the impact. Some MAY subscribe to the theory of immobilising patients ASAP thereafter (when medical help arrives at scene) either:- (i) to ensure that an injury that has occurred is not worsened; or, (ii) because a patient is "lucky" not to have sustained an injury so far (without immobilisation etc.) and that immobilisation at this point will prevent a potential injury from occurring from that point thereafter. Matthew R Surgery UK -----Original Message----- From: David Sullivan [mailto:fpcems at yahoo.com] Sent: 17 August 2007 21:39 To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list Subject: RE: Question for the prehospital experts Matt, I hear totally hear where your coming from with this. If a patient wants to refuse a board and collor (and can medically do so and documented) a doc can yell at me till his face turns blue, and its not going to bother me one bit, i pass on my concerns to the ED staff. If the MOI suggests that I collor and board someone then I just do it, and not give the option. Heres a funny story about me...i was in a sports accident last year, I play in a mens hockey league, I collied with another player, and was knocked unconcious. my teammates (layman) assisted me off the ice (after about 1-2 mins) and I was walked to the locker room, where my skates where taken off, and the medics came. (i read my own runsheet) i had a GCS of 9, combative, signifigant MOI, but I walked to the locker room?? and I can only recite my paramedic number? do I need a collor and board? what do you think
- Previous message: New Intern, Resident, Internist, Family Practioner, -- CT Scan
- Next message: Question for the prehospital experts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the trauma-list mailing list
